Publikation: Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember
Dateien
Datum
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
A current focus in the prospective memory literature is the extent to which a prospective memory task (remembering to perform a future action) interferes with ongoing activities (defined in this study as lexical decision latencies). In the present study, participants had to detect one, two, three, four, five, or six prospective memory cues. Results showed no significant increase in lexical decision latencies with one or two targets; however, significant costs emerged with three or more targets. Furthermore, task interference showed a linear increase in task costs for word trial performance but not for nonword trial performance. Practical and theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
COHEN, Anna-Lisa, Alexander JAUDAS, Peter M. GOLLWITZER, 2008. Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember. In: Memory & Cognition. 2008, 36(1), pp. 149-156. Available under: doi: 10.3758/MC.36.1.149BibTex
@article{Cohen2008Numbe-10558, year={2008}, doi={10.3758/MC.36.1.149}, title={Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember}, number={1}, volume={36}, journal={Memory & Cognition}, pages={149--156}, author={Cohen, Anna-Lisa and Jaudas, Alexander and Gollwitzer, Peter M.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/10558"> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:19:15Z</dc:date> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10558/1/Number_of_cues_influences_the_cost_of_remembering_to_remember.pdf"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/> <dc:creator>Cohen, Anna-Lisa</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/10558"/> <dc:contributor>Jaudas, Alexander</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Cohen, Anna-Lisa</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Jaudas, Alexander</dc:creator> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10558/1/Number_of_cues_influences_the_cost_of_remembering_to_remember.pdf"/> <dc:contributor>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:contributor> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:19:15Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Memory & Cognition 36 (2008), 1, pp. 149-156</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">A current focus in the prospective memory literature is the extent to which a prospective memory task (remembering to perform a future action) interferes with ongoing activities (defined in this study as lexical decision latencies). In the present study, participants had to detect one, two, three, four, five, or six prospective memory cues. Results showed no significant increase in lexical decision latencies with one or two targets; however, significant costs emerged with three or more targets. Furthermore, task interference showed a linear increase in task costs for word trial performance but not for nonword trial performance. Practical and theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.</dcterms:abstract> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights> <dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>