Publikation:

Motor imagery in stroke patients, or plegic patients with spinal cord or peripheral diseases

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2012

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. Wiley. 2012, 126(4), pp. 238-247. ISSN 0065-1427. eISSN 1600-5449. Available under: doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2012.01680.x

Zusammenfassung

Objectives
When motor imagery (MI) is impaired in stroke patients, it is not clear, whether this is caused by the central lesion with a disruption of networks or this may be due to inactivity/lack of practice following hemiparesis. To answer this question, we investigated MI in two groups of patients: stroke patients and patients with no central lesion, who suffered high‐grade tetraparesis caused by myopathy or spinal muscular atrophy.

Materials and Methods
The first study measured MI in 31 sub‐acute and chronic stroke patients with hand paresis. We used self‐assessment questionnaires [Kinaesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ), the Vividness of Motor Imagery Questionnaire (VMIQ)] as well as a new chronometric test (mental version and normal/physical version of Box and Block Test). The second study assessed MI in 10 patients without a central lesion, but with severe tetraparesis of peripheral origin. They were incapable of performing the requested task physically.

Results
MI in patients was better (i) for the third‐person (VMIQ3.P) compared to the first‐person perspective (VMIQ1.P), (ii) in patients without sensory impairment compared to those with impaired proprioception, (iii) in patients with light paresis compared to severe paresis and (iv) for the non‐affected than the affected hand (KVIQ‐10). Patients with severe tetraparesis were able to imagine another person's knee bends, but were not capable of imagining themselves performing knee bends.

Conclusions
MI may be hampered on the affected side in severely paretic patients, particularly in the presence of impaired proprioception. Remarkably, the second study illustrates that motor experiences shape MI. This confirms the close relationship between MI and movement execution. The study advocates the careful use of test batteries for assessment of MI when investigating mental training in clinical trials. Not all patients might benefit to the same extent from MI training. This is possibly contingent on intact proprioception and preserved MI.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690DETTMERS, Christian, M. BENZ, Joachim LIEPERT, Brigitte ROCKSTROH, 2012. Motor imagery in stroke patients, or plegic patients with spinal cord or peripheral diseases. In: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. Wiley. 2012, 126(4), pp. 238-247. ISSN 0065-1427. eISSN 1600-5449. Available under: doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2012.01680.x
BibTex
@article{Dettmers2012-10Motor-48698,
  year={2012},
  doi={10.1111/j.1600-0404.2012.01680.x},
  title={Motor imagery in stroke patients, or plegic patients with spinal cord or peripheral diseases},
  number={4},
  volume={126},
  issn={0065-1427},
  journal={Acta Neurologica Scandinavica},
  pages={238--247},
  author={Dettmers, Christian and Benz, M. and Liepert, Joachim and Rockstroh, Brigitte}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/48698">
    <dc:creator>Rockstroh, Brigitte</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Benz, M.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Liepert, Joachim</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Rockstroh, Brigitte</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:creator>Liepert, Joachim</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Benz, M.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Objectives&lt;br /&gt;When motor imagery (MI) is impaired in stroke patients, it is not clear, whether this is caused by the central lesion with a disruption of networks or this may be due to inactivity/lack of practice following hemiparesis. To answer this question, we investigated MI in two groups of patients: stroke patients and patients with no central lesion, who suffered high‐grade tetraparesis caused by myopathy or spinal muscular atrophy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Materials and Methods&lt;br /&gt;The first study measured MI in 31 sub‐acute and chronic stroke patients with hand paresis. We used self‐assessment questionnaires [Kinaesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ), the Vividness of Motor Imagery Questionnaire (VMIQ)] as well as a new chronometric test (mental version and normal/physical version of Box and Block Test). The second study assessed MI in 10 patients without a central lesion, but with severe tetraparesis of peripheral origin. They were incapable of performing the requested task physically.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Results&lt;br /&gt;MI in patients was better (i) for the third‐person (VMIQ&lt;sub&gt;3.P&lt;/sub&gt;) compared to the first‐person perspective (VMIQ&lt;sub&gt;1.P&lt;/sub&gt;), (ii) in patients without sensory impairment compared to those with impaired proprioception, (iii) in patients with light paresis compared to severe paresis and (iv) for the non‐affected than the affected hand (KVIQ‐10). Patients with severe tetraparesis were able to imagine another person's knee bends, but were not capable of imagining themselves performing knee bends.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conclusions&lt;br /&gt;MI may be hampered on the affected side in severely paretic patients, particularly in the presence of impaired proprioception. Remarkably, the second study illustrates that motor experiences shape MI. This confirms the close relationship between MI and movement execution. The study advocates the careful use of test batteries for assessment of MI when investigating mental training in clinical trials. Not all patients might benefit to the same extent from MI training. This is possibly contingent on intact proprioception and preserved MI.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:issued>2012-10</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Dettmers, Christian</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-02-18T14:16:28Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-02-18T14:16:28Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:title>Motor imagery in stroke patients, or plegic patients with spinal cord or peripheral diseases</dcterms:title>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/48698"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Dettmers, Christian</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen