Publikation: 'Too little too late' or 'premature'? : the Brazilian Truth Commission and the Question of 'best timing'
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
This article combines empirical findings on recent Brazilian history and theoretical questions related to the timing and nature of mechanisms associated with political transitions by raising the controversial question of whether the recently inaugurated Brazilian Truth Commission is ‘too little too late’ or even ‘premature’. After locating it in its wider historical context, this article introduces key competing opinions about the Brazilian Truth Commission, which has been perceived as belated and weak in comparison with those of other Latin American countries. Yet, rather than aligning itself with any of these positions, the Brazilian Truth Commission serves to exemplify that there is neither a generic nor an ‘impartial’ solution to the question of best practice and timing—any evaluation of the Commission depends on its specific goals and key target group. Processes of transition are neither linear nor predictable; they constitute power struggles, depend on the population's interest in the past, and can take on a dynamic of their own.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
SCHNEIDER, Nina, 2013. 'Too little too late' or 'premature'? : the Brazilian Truth Commission and the Question of 'best timing'. In: Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research. 2013, 19(1), pp. 149-162. ISSN 1326-0219. eISSN 2151-9668. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13260219.2013.806017BibTex
@article{Schneider2013littl-24048, year={2013}, doi={10.1080/13260219.2013.806017}, title={'Too little too late' or 'premature'? : the Brazilian Truth Commission and the Question of 'best timing'}, number={1}, volume={19}, issn={1326-0219}, journal={Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research}, pages={149--162}, author={Schneider, Nina} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/24048"> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/24048"/> <dc:creator>Schneider, Nina</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/32"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:title>'Too little too late' or 'premature'? : the Brazilian Truth Commission and the Question of 'best timing'</dcterms:title> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/32"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Journal of Iberian and Latin-American Research ; 19 (2013), 1. - S. 149-162</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-07-10T14:59:26Z</dc:date> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-07-10T14:59:26Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This article combines empirical findings on recent Brazilian history and theoretical questions related to the timing and nature of mechanisms associated with political transitions by raising the controversial question of whether the recently inaugurated Brazilian Truth Commission is ‘too little too late’ or even ‘premature’. After locating it in its wider historical context, this article introduces key competing opinions about the Brazilian Truth Commission, which has been perceived as belated and weak in comparison with those of other Latin American countries. Yet, rather than aligning itself with any of these positions, the Brazilian Truth Commission serves to exemplify that there is neither a generic nor an ‘impartial’ solution to the question of best practice and timing—any evaluation of the Commission depends on its specific goals and key target group. Processes of transition are neither linear nor predictable; they constitute power struggles, depend on the population's interest in the past, and can take on a dynamic of their own.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> <dc:contributor>Schneider, Nina</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>