Publikation:

Emotions in misinformation studies : distinguishing affective state from emotional response and misinformation recognition from acceptance

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Luehring_2-3sn5lkxcvoim0.pdf
Luehring_2-3sn5lkxcvoim0.pdfGröße: 3.23 MBDownloads: 3

Datum

2024

Autor:innen

Lühring, Jula
Shetty, Apeksha
Koschmieder, Corinna
Waldherr, Annie
Metzler, Hannah

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. Springer. 2024, 9, 82. eISSN 2365-7464. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00607-0

Zusammenfassung

Prior studies indicate that emotions, particularly high-arousal emotions, may elicit rapid intuitive thinking, thereby decreasing the ability to recognize misinformation. Yet, few studies have distinguished prior affective states from emotional reactions to false news, which could influence belief in falsehoods in different ways. Extending a study by Martel et al. (Cognit Res: Principles Implic 5: 1–20, 2020), we conducted a pre-registered online survey experiment in Austria (N = 422), investigating associations of emotions and discernment of false and real news related to COVID-19. We found no associations of prior affective state with discernment, but observed higher anger and less joy in response to false compared to real news. Exploratory analyses, including automated analyses of open-ended text responses, suggested that anger arose for different reasons in different people depending on their prior beliefs. In our educated and left-leaning sample, higher anger was often related to recognizing the misinformation as such, rather than accepting the false claims. We conclude that studies need to distinguish between prior affective state and emotional response to misinformation and consider individuals’ prior beliefs as determinants of emotions.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Misinformation, Emotion, Anger, Discernment, Recognition, Belief, COVID-19

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Datensatz
Emotion in misinformation studies: Distinguishing affective state from emotional response and misinformation recognition from acceptance
(2022) Shetty, Apeksha; Metzler, Hannah; Koschmieder, Corinna; Garcia, David; Lühring, Jula; Waldherr, Annie

Zitieren

ISO 690LÜHRING, Jula, Apeksha SHETTY, Corinna KOSCHMIEDER, David GARCIA, Annie WALDHERR, Hannah METZLER, 2024. Emotions in misinformation studies : distinguishing affective state from emotional response and misinformation recognition from acceptance. In: Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. Springer. 2024, 9, 82. eISSN 2365-7464. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00607-0
BibTex
@article{Luhring2024-12-18Emoti-72147,
  title={Emotions in misinformation studies : distinguishing affective state from emotional response and misinformation recognition from acceptance},
  year={2024},
  doi={10.1186/s41235-024-00607-0},
  volume={9},
  journal={Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications},
  author={Lühring, Jula and Shetty, Apeksha and Koschmieder, Corinna and Garcia, David and Waldherr, Annie and Metzler, Hannah},
  note={Article Number: 82}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/72147">
    <dcterms:issued>2024-12-18</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Waldherr, Annie</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Koschmieder, Corinna</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:creator>Shetty, Apeksha</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:contributor>Lühring, Jula</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Lühring, Jula</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/72147/1/Luehring_2-3sn5lkxcvoim0.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Koschmieder, Corinna</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/72147"/>
    <dc:contributor>Shetty, Apeksha</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Garcia, David</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/72147/1/Luehring_2-3sn5lkxcvoim0.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:abstract>Prior studies indicate that emotions, particularly high-arousal emotions, may elicit rapid intuitive thinking, thereby decreasing the ability to recognize misinformation. Yet, few studies have distinguished prior affective states from emotional reactions to false news, which could influence belief in falsehoods in different ways. Extending a study by Martel et al. (Cognit Res: Principles Implic 5: 1–20, 2020), we conducted a pre-registered online survey experiment in Austria (N = 422), investigating associations of emotions and discernment of false and real news related to COVID-19. We found no associations of prior affective state with discernment, but observed higher anger and less joy in response to false compared to real news. Exploratory analyses, including automated analyses of open-ended text responses, suggested that anger arose for different reasons in different people depending on their prior beliefs. In our educated and left-leaning sample, higher anger was often related to recognizing the misinformation as such, rather than accepting the false claims. We conclude that studies need to distinguish between prior affective state and emotional response to misinformation and consider individuals’ prior beliefs as determinants of emotions.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-01-31T09:56:40Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Metzler, Hannah</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Metzler, Hannah</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Waldherr, Annie</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Emotions in misinformation studies : distinguishing affective state from emotional response and misinformation recognition from acceptance</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Garcia, David</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-01-31T09:56:40Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen