Publikation: Notions of at-issueness
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Upon hearing the sentence Messi, who once scored a goal with his hand, won the Ballon d'Or, the addressee is likely to interpret the main clause as conveying the “main point” and view the appositive relative clause as contributing secondary information. The intuition that some part of the utterance conveys the main point has recently been discussed in formal semantics and pragmatics under the label of “at‐issueness.” However, this label has been used in a variety of ways, and there is often little clarity as to what is meant by it. This survey tries to clear things up by identifying and spelling out three specific notions of at‐issueness, i.e. Q(uestion)‐at‐issueness, P(roposal)‐at‐issueness, and C(oherence)‐at‐issueness. After looking into what they say about similar kinds of data, I conclude that while these notions appear to capture facets of the same broad intuition, they are truly distinct. The paper also discusses potential connections of at‐issueness to projection and commitment strength.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
KOEV, Todor, 2018. Notions of at-issueness. In: Language and Linguistics Compass. Wiley. 2018, 12(12), e12306. eISSN 1749-818X. Available under: doi: 10.1111/lnc3.12306BibTex
@article{Koev2018-12-05Notio-51534,
year={2018},
doi={10.1111/lnc3.12306},
title={Notions of at-issueness},
number={12},
volume={12},
journal={Language and Linguistics Compass},
author={Koev, Todor},
note={Article Number: e12306}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/51534">
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Koev, Todor</dc:creator>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/51534"/>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-10-29T14:22:06Z</dcterms:available>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
<dc:contributor>Koev, Todor</dc:contributor>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-10-29T14:22:06Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dcterms:issued>2018-12-05</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Upon hearing the sentence Messi, who once scored a goal with his hand, won the Ballon d'Or, the addressee is likely to interpret the main clause as conveying the “main point” and view the appositive relative clause as contributing secondary information. The intuition that some part of the utterance conveys the main point has recently been discussed in formal semantics and pragmatics under the label of “at‐issueness.” However, this label has been used in a variety of ways, and there is often little clarity as to what is meant by it. This survey tries to clear things up by identifying and spelling out three specific notions of at‐issueness, i.e. Q(uestion)‐at‐issueness, P(roposal)‐at‐issueness, and C(oherence)‐at‐issueness. After looking into what they say about similar kinds of data, I conclude that while these notions appear to capture facets of the same broad intuition, they are truly distinct. The paper also discusses potential connections of at‐issueness to projection and commitment strength.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:title>Notions of at-issueness</dcterms:title>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
