Publikation: 'Can you wash off the hogwash?' : semantic transparency of first and second constituents in the processing of German compounds
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
This study examined whether the lexical processing of German compounds is driven by semantic transparency and applied an overt visual priming experiment to manipulate the transparency of modifiers or heads. When manipulating modifiers, participants responded to compounds like Hundeauge (“dog’s eye”) or Hühnerauge (“corn”; literal: “hen's eye”) that were preceded by their transparent (Hund, “dog”) or opaque (Huhn, “hen”) modifier, respectively, or unrelated controls. When manipulating heads, participants responded to compounds like Pferdeohr (“horse’s ear”) or Eselsohr (“dog-ear”; literal: “donkey’s ear”) that were preceded by their transparently or opaquely related head Ohr (“ear”), or an unrelated control. Results showed that compound frequency was facilitatory, head frequency was inhibitory, and modifier frequency was both. These findings indicate that compound constituents and their corresponding independent words compete in compound processing. Furthermore, both modifiers and heads induced priming regardless of their semantic transparency, indicating that lexical representation in German incorporates constituent structure, regardless of semantic transparency.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
SMOLKA, Eva, Gary LIBBEN, 2017. 'Can you wash off the hogwash?' : semantic transparency of first and second constituents in the processing of German compounds. In: Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 2017, 32(4), pp. 514-531. ISSN 2327-3798. eISSN 2327-3801. Available under: doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1256492BibTex
@article{Smolka2017-04-21hogwa-39072, year={2017}, doi={10.1080/23273798.2016.1256492}, title={'Can you wash off the hogwash?' : semantic transparency of first and second constituents in the processing of German compounds}, number={4}, volume={32}, issn={2327-3798}, journal={Language, Cognition and Neuroscience}, pages={514--531}, author={Smolka, Eva and Libben, Gary} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/39072"> <dc:contributor>Libben, Gary</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Smolka, Eva</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-05-30T12:41:27Z</dcterms:available> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This study examined whether the lexical processing of German compounds is driven by semantic transparency and applied an overt visual priming experiment to manipulate the transparency of modifiers or heads. When manipulating modifiers, participants responded to compounds like Hundeauge (“dog’s eye”) or Hühnerauge (“corn”; literal: “hen's eye”) that were preceded by their transparent (Hund, “dog”) or opaque (Huhn, “hen”) modifier, respectively, or unrelated controls. When manipulating heads, participants responded to compounds like Pferdeohr (“horse’s ear”) or Eselsohr (“dog-ear”; literal: “donkey’s ear”) that were preceded by their transparently or opaquely related head Ohr (“ear”), or an unrelated control. Results showed that compound frequency was facilitatory, head frequency was inhibitory, and modifier frequency was both. These findings indicate that compound constituents and their corresponding independent words compete in compound processing. Furthermore, both modifiers and heads induced priming regardless of their semantic transparency, indicating that lexical representation in German incorporates constituent structure, regardless of semantic transparency.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-05-30T12:41:27Z</dc:date> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:issued>2017-04-21</dcterms:issued> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:creator>Libben, Gary</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>'Can you wash off the hogwash?' : semantic transparency of first and second constituents in the processing of German compounds</dcterms:title> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dc:creator>Smolka, Eva</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/39072"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>