Publikation: The Die Is Cast : Decision‐Making Under Risk and Under Ambiguity in Schizophrenia and Alcohol Use Disorder
Dateien
Datum
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG): OD 113/2‐1
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Patients with schizophrenia (SZ) tend towards riskier decision-making (DM). Yet the specificity of these findings, as well as the impact of impairments in executive functions (EF), has not been sufficiently clarified. In a preregistered study (https:// osf. io/ n7z6y ) 40 SZ, 50 patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and 36 healthy controls (HC) completed an n-back task (as EF challenge), the Game of Dice Task (GDT; DM under risk) and the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT; DM under ambiguity). AUD and SZ performed worse than HC in the n-back task and riskier in the GDT. In the IGT, only AUD performed riskier than HC and preferred disadvantageous Deck B compared to SZ. However, controlling for demographics and IQ abolished significance. Correlations of performance in the GDT and IGT with working memory differed between groups. Taken together, both patient groups show a deficit in the reflective system, whereas only AUD show impairments in the impulsive system. Thus, the direct comparison of DM in SZ and AUD reveals a differential DM profile of SZ and AUD. Our results suggest that both groups may benefit from EF training, especially in planning, categorization and cognitive flexibility, whereas AUD could additionally profit from impulse control and inhibition training. However, the findings need replication with well-matched samples, and the link between EF and DM in SZ should be examined more carefully with experimental approaches.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
STUMPP, Sarah, Alexander WOLBER, Natascha BÜCHELE, Leonie LIPINSKI, Stephanie N. L. SCHMIDT, Brigitte ROCKSTROH, Michael ODENWALD, Daniela MIER, 2025. The Die Is Cast : Decision‐Making Under Risk and Under Ambiguity in Schizophrenia and Alcohol Use Disorder. In: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. Wiley. 2025, 32(6), e70178. ISSN 1063-3995. eISSN 1099-0879. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1002/cpp.70178BibTex
@article{Stumpp2025-11Decis-75366,
title={The Die Is Cast : Decision‐Making Under Risk and Under Ambiguity in Schizophrenia and Alcohol Use Disorder},
year={2025},
doi={10.1002/cpp.70178},
number={6},
volume={32},
issn={1063-3995},
journal={Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy},
author={Stumpp, Sarah and Wolber, Alexander and Büchele, Natascha and Lipinski, Leonie and Schmidt, Stephanie N. L. and Rockstroh, Brigitte and Odenwald, Michael and Mier, Daniela},
note={Article Number: e70178}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/75366">
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Büchele, Natascha</dc:creator>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/75366/1/Stumpp_2-4ka4oo37qii79.pdf"/>
<dc:contributor>Stumpp, Sarah</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Wolber, Alexander</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Schmidt, Stephanie N. L.</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Wolber, Alexander</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Odenwald, Michael</dc:creator>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<dc:creator>Rockstroh, Brigitte</dc:creator>
<dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
<dc:creator>Schmidt, Stephanie N. L.</dc:creator>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-12-03T10:14:42Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:creator>Lipinski, Leonie</dc:creator>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/75366"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
<dcterms:issued>2025-11</dcterms:issued>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-12-03T10:14:42Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/75366/1/Stumpp_2-4ka4oo37qii79.pdf"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:contributor>Büchele, Natascha</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:title>The Die Is Cast : Decision‐Making Under Risk and Under Ambiguity in Schizophrenia and Alcohol Use Disorder</dcterms:title>
<dc:contributor>Lipinski, Leonie</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Odenwald, Michael</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Mier, Daniela</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Stumpp, Sarah</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Mier, Daniela</dc:creator>
<dcterms:abstract>Patients with schizophrenia (SZ) tend towards riskier decision-making (DM). Yet the specificity of these findings, as well as the impact of impairments in executive functions (EF), has not been sufficiently clarified. In a preregistered study (https:// osf. io/
n7z6y ) 40 SZ, 50 patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and 36 healthy controls (HC) completed an n-back task (as EF challenge), the Game of Dice Task (GDT; DM under risk) and the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT; DM under ambiguity). AUD and SZ performed worse than HC in the n-back task and riskier in the GDT. In the IGT, only AUD performed riskier than HC and preferred disadvantageous Deck B compared to SZ. However, controlling for demographics and IQ abolished significance. Correlations of performance in the GDT and IGT with working memory differed between groups. Taken together, both patient groups show a deficit in the reflective system, whereas only AUD show impairments in the impulsive system. Thus, the direct comparison of
DM in SZ and AUD reveals a differential DM profile of SZ and AUD. Our results suggest that both groups may benefit from EF training, especially in planning, categorization and cognitive flexibility, whereas AUD could additionally profit from impulse
control and inhibition training. However, the findings need replication with well-matched samples, and the link between EF and DM in SZ should be examined more carefully with experimental approaches.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:contributor>Rockstroh, Brigitte</dc:contributor>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>