Diagramm, Experiment und die Anschaulichkeit von Theorie : zur Schematisierung der Bewegung bei Galileo Galilei
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
EU-Projektnummer
DFG-Projektnummer
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
How and where do relationships arise that can be rendered diagramma- tically? Do they emerge through the process of human reasoning or through the act of drawing on surface? Or do they unfold in the dynamic processes at play in observable reality? The following article argues that the latter is the case, making recourse to the philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce. As a case study, it explores Galileo Galilei’s investigation of free-fall motion and examines both printed texts and manuscripts in order to understand how Galilei arrived at his conclusions. While the published diagrams present his results in graphic traditions that date back to the 14th century, Galilei’s handwritten sketches and notes demonstrate the difficult process of hypothesis formation. In these documents we can observe Galilei grappling with adapting the forms of older diagrammatical notation to his experiments. Through close observation of the phenomena in front of him, Galileo tries to comprehend clearly which parameters of motion can be measured and correlated on the inclined plane.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BOGEN, Steffen, 2017. Diagramm, Experiment und die Anschaulichkeit von Theorie : zur Schematisierung der Bewegung bei Galileo Galilei. In: Das Mittelalter : Perspektiven mediävistischer Forschung.. 2017, 22(2), pp. 431-455. ISSN 0949-0345. eISSN 2196-6869. Available under: doi: 10.1515/mial-2017-0025BibTex
@article{Bogen2017Diagr-40922, year={2017}, doi={10.1515/mial-2017-0025}, title={Diagramm, Experiment und die Anschaulichkeit von Theorie : zur Schematisierung der Bewegung bei Galileo Galilei}, number={2}, volume={22}, issn={0949-0345}, journal={Das Mittelalter : Perspektiven mediävistischer Forschung.}, pages={431--455}, author={Bogen, Steffen} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40922"> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="deu">How and where do relationships arise that can be rendered diagramma- tically? Do they emerge through the process of human reasoning or through the act of drawing on surface? Or do they unfold in the dynamic processes at play in observable reality? The following article argues that the latter is the case, making recourse to the philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce. As a case study, it explores Galileo Galilei’s investigation of free-fall motion and examines both printed texts and manuscripts in order to understand how Galilei arrived at his conclusions. While the published diagrams present his results in graphic traditions that date back to the 14th century, Galilei’s handwritten sketches and notes demonstrate the difficult process of hypothesis formation. In these documents we can observe Galilei grappling with adapting the forms of older diagrammatical notation to his experiments. Through close observation of the phenomena in front of him, Galileo tries to comprehend clearly which parameters of motion can be measured and correlated on the inclined plane.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:title>Diagramm, Experiment und die Anschaulichkeit von Theorie : zur Schematisierung der Bewegung bei Galileo Galilei</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Bogen, Steffen</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-12-13T12:19:45Z</dcterms:available> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/40922/3/Bogen_2-5maajirpb16m5.pdf"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/40922"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued> <dc:language>deu</dc:language> <dc:creator>Bogen, Steffen</dc:creator> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/40922/3/Bogen_2-5maajirpb16m5.pdf"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-12-13T12:19:45Z</dc:date> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>