Publikation: Why semantic differentials in web-based research should be made from visual analogue scales and not from 5-point scales
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2012
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Field Methods. 2012, 24(3), pp. 310-327. ISSN 1525-822X. eISSN 1552-3969. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1525822X12444061
Zusammenfassung
In a web experiment, participants were randomly assigned to two semantic differentials either made from discrete 5-point ordinal rating scales or from continuous visual analogue scales (VASs) with 250 gradations. Respondents adjusted their ratings with VASs more often to maximize the precision of answers, which had a beneficial effect on data quality. No side effects like differences in means, higher dropout, more nonresponse, or higher response times were observed. Overall, the combination of semantic differentials and VASs results in a number of advantages. Potential for further research is discussed.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
visual analogue scale, VAS, Likert scale, semantic differential, web survey
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
FUNKE, Frederik, Ulf-Dietrich REIPS, 2012. Why semantic differentials in web-based research should be made from visual analogue scales and not from 5-point scales. In: Field Methods. 2012, 24(3), pp. 310-327. ISSN 1525-822X. eISSN 1552-3969. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1525822X12444061BibTex
@article{Funke2012seman-28643,
year={2012},
doi={10.1177/1525822X12444061},
title={Why semantic differentials in web-based research should be made from visual analogue scales and not from 5-point scales},
number={3},
volume={24},
issn={1525-822X},
journal={Field Methods},
pages={310--327},
author={Funke, Frederik and Reips, Ulf-Dietrich}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28643">
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-08-13T13:26:46Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Funke, Frederik</dc:creator>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In a web experiment, participants were randomly assigned to two semantic differentials either made from discrete 5-point ordinal rating scales or from continuous visual analogue scales (VASs) with 250 gradations. Respondents adjusted their ratings with VASs more often to maximize the precision of answers, which had a beneficial effect on data quality. No side effects like differences in means, higher dropout, more nonresponse, or higher response times were observed. Overall, the combination of semantic differentials and VASs results in a number of advantages. Potential for further research is discussed.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:title>Why semantic differentials in web-based research should be made from visual analogue scales and not from 5-point scales</dcterms:title>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:creator>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</dc:creator>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/28643/2/Funke_286431.pdf"/>
<dc:contributor>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</dc:contributor>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/28643/2/Funke_286431.pdf"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/28643"/>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Field Methods ; 24 (2012), 3. - S. 310-327</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
<dc:contributor>Funke, Frederik</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-08-13T13:26:46Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Versionsgeschichte
You are currently viewing version 1 of the item.