Publikation: On the efficacy of Narrative Exposure Therapy : a reply to Mundt et al.
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2014
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Intervention. 2014, 12(2), pp. 267-278. ISSN 1571-8883. eISSN 1872-1001. Available under: doi: 10.1097/WTF.0000000000000016
Zusammenfassung
In their review article, Mundt et al. (2014), ‘Evaluating interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder in low and middle income countries: Narrative Exposure Therapy’, (Intervention, this issue) evaluated Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET) as an example of a short-term treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder that is applied in low and middle income, post conflict settings. They concluded that it is premature to recommend NET as a treatment approach. In this response, the clinicians and researchers who developed NET argue that the paper by Mundt et al. does not correctly represent the rationale of NET and that the methodological critique of the NET trials in the article is biased. Compared to other types of psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions in post conflict settings, the evidence base of NET is strong, and the application of NET within a sustainable mental healthcare system can be recommended.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
NEUNER, Frank, Maggie SCHAUER, Thomas ELBERT, 2014. On the efficacy of Narrative Exposure Therapy : a reply to Mundt et al.. In: Intervention. 2014, 12(2), pp. 267-278. ISSN 1571-8883. eISSN 1872-1001. Available under: doi: 10.1097/WTF.0000000000000016BibTex
@article{Neuner2014effic-30038,
year={2014},
doi={10.1097/WTF.0000000000000016},
title={On the efficacy of Narrative Exposure Therapy : a reply to Mundt et al.},
number={2},
volume={12},
issn={1571-8883},
journal={Intervention},
pages={267--278},
author={Neuner, Frank and Schauer, Maggie and Elbert, Thomas}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30038">
<dcterms:title>On the efficacy of Narrative Exposure Therapy : a reply to Mundt et al.</dcterms:title>
<dc:creator>Schauer, Maggie</dc:creator>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-02-25T09:50:53Z</dc:date>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/30038"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:contributor>Neuner, Frank</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Neuner, Frank</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Elbert, Thomas</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Schauer, Maggie</dc:contributor>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30038/1/Neuner_0-264382.pdf"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-02-25T09:50:53Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:issued>2014</dcterms:issued>
<dc:contributor>Elbert, Thomas</dc:contributor>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30038/1/Neuner_0-264382.pdf"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In their review article, Mundt et al. (2014), ‘Evaluating interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder in low and middle income countries: Narrative Exposure Therapy’, (Intervention, this issue) evaluated Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET) as an example of a short-term treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder that is applied in low and middle income, post conflict settings. They concluded that it is premature to recommend NET as a treatment approach. In this response, the clinicians and researchers who developed NET argue that the paper by Mundt et al. does not correctly represent the rationale of NET and that the methodological critique of the NET trials in the article is biased. Compared to other types of psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions in post conflict settings, the evidence base of NET is strong, and the application of NET within a sustainable mental healthcare system can be recommended.</dcterms:abstract>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
