Publikation: Research evaluation and journal quality weights : much ado about nothing?
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2010
Autor:innen
Krapf, Matthias
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Working Paper/Technical Report
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Research evaluations based on quality weighted publication output are often criticized on account of the employed journal quality weights. This study shows that evaluations of entire research organizations are very robust with respect to the choice of readily available weighting schemes. We document this robustness by applying rather different weighting schemes to otherwise identical rankings. Our unit of analysis consists of German, Austrian and Swiss university departments in business administration and economics.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
330 Wirtschaft
Schlagwörter
Research evaluation, university management
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
KRAPF, Matthias, 2010. Research evaluation and journal quality weights : much ado about nothing?BibTex
@techreport{Krapf2010Resea-29525,
year={2010},
series={Working Paper Series / Department of Economics},
title={Research evaluation and journal quality weights : much ado about nothing?},
number={2010-02},
author={Krapf, Matthias}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/29525">
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/29525/3/Krapf_0-269612.pdf"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
<dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/29525"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-01-16T10:25:58Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Research evaluations based on quality weighted publication output are often criticized on account of the employed journal quality weights. This study shows that evaluations of entire research organizations are very robust with respect to the choice of readily available weighting schemes. We document this robustness by applying rather different weighting schemes to otherwise identical rankings. Our unit of analysis consists of German, Austrian and Swiss university departments in business administration and economics.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/29525/3/Krapf_0-269612.pdf"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
<dc:creator>Krapf, Matthias</dc:creator>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:contributor>Krapf, Matthias</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-01-16T10:25:58Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:title>Research evaluation and journal quality weights : much ado about nothing?</dcterms:title>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
