Publikation: The prosody of rhetorical vs. information-seeking questions in Icelandic
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
This paper reports on a production experiment investigating the prosodic realization of rhetorical questions (RQs) as compared to information seeking questions (ISQs) in Icelandic. It looks at two question types: polar questions (Borðar einhver límónur? 'Does anybody eat limes?') and wh-questions (Hver borðar límónur? 'Who eats limes?'). The main results are as follows. (i) In both question types, the boundary tone fails to contribute to the distinction between ISQs and RQs. It is L% almost across the board. (ii) The semantic difference between ISQs and RQs is reflected in the nuclear accents: In wh-questions, ISQs have more monotonal (H*/!H*/^H*) pitch accents, while RQs have more bitonal ones (mostly L+H*/L+!H*/L+^H*) In polar questions, nuclear accents are mostly L+H, but the timing of the rise differs (more L*+H in ISQs, more L+H* in RQs). (iii) The first word of the utterance and the nuclear syllable are longer in RQs than in ISQs in both question types. Within the nuclear syllable, both onset and rhyme are lengthened. Taken together, prosody helps to distinguish between ISQs and RQs, but the terminus of the intonational contour (boundary tone) is not essential.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
DEHÉ, Nicole, Bettina BRAUN, Daniela WOCHNER, 2018. The prosody of rhetorical vs. information-seeking questions in Icelandic. 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2018. Poznan, Poland, 13. Juni 2018 - 16. Juni 2018. In: KLESSA, Katarzyna, ed. and others. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2018. Baixas, France: ISCA, 2018, pp. 403-407. eISSN 2333-2042. Available under: doi: 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-82BibTex
@inproceedings{Dehe2018-06-13proso-42625, year={2018}, doi={10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-82}, title={The prosody of rhetorical vs. information-seeking questions in Icelandic}, publisher={ISCA}, address={Baixas, France}, booktitle={Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2018}, pages={403--407}, editor={Klessa, Katarzyna}, author={Dehé, Nicole and Braun, Bettina and Wochner, Daniela} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42625"> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:issued>2018-06-13</dcterms:issued> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/42625/3/Dehe_2-7ezfudqecisn8.pdf"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:contributor>Braun, Bettina</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/42625"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-06-19T13:59:44Z</dc:date> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-06-19T13:59:44Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Braun, Bettina</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>The prosody of rhetorical vs. information-seeking questions in Icelandic</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Wochner, Daniela</dc:contributor> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/42625/3/Dehe_2-7ezfudqecisn8.pdf"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:creator>Wochner, Daniela</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Dehé, Nicole</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper reports on a production experiment investigating the prosodic realization of rhetorical questions (RQs) as compared to information seeking questions (ISQs) in Icelandic. It looks at two question types: polar questions (Borðar einhver límónur? 'Does anybody eat limes?') and wh-questions (Hver borðar límónur? 'Who eats limes?'). The main results are as follows. (i) In both question types, the boundary tone fails to contribute to the distinction between ISQs and RQs. It is L% almost across the board. (ii) The semantic difference between ISQs and RQs is reflected in the nuclear accents: In wh-questions, ISQs have more monotonal (H*/!H*/^H*) pitch accents, while RQs have more bitonal ones (mostly L+H*/L+!H*/L+^H*) In polar questions, nuclear accents are mostly L+H, but the timing of the rise differs (more L*+H in ISQs, more L+H* in RQs). (iii) The first word of the utterance and the nuclear syllable are longer in RQs than in ISQs in both question types. Within the nuclear syllable, both onset and rhyme are lengthened. Taken together, prosody helps to distinguish between ISQs and RQs, but the terminus of the intonational contour (boundary tone) is not essential.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Dehé, Nicole</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>