Visual Quality Assessment for Motion Compensated Frame Interpolation
Visual Quality Assessment for Motion Compensated Frame Interpolation
No Thumbnail Available
Files
There are no files associated with this item.
Date
2019
Authors
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
oops
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Contribution to a conference collection
Publication status
Published
Published in
2019 Eleventh International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) : June 5-7, 2019, Berlin, Germany / IEEE Computer Society, / (ed.). - Piscataway : IEEE, 2019. - pp. 197-203. - ISBN 978-1-5386-8212-8
Abstract
Current benchmarks for optical flow algorithms evaluate the estimation quality by comparing their predicted flow field with the ground truth, and additionally may compare interpolated frames, based on these predictions, with the correct frames from the actual image sequences. For the latter comparisons, objective measures such as mean square errors are applied. However, for applications like image interpolation, the expected user's quality of experience cannot be fully deduced from such simple quality measures. Therefore, we conducted a subjective quality assessment study by crowdsourcing for the interpolated images provided in one of the optical flow benchmarks, the Middlebury benchmark. We used paired comparisons with forced choice and reconstructed absolute quality scale values according to Thurstone's model using the classical least squares method. The results give rise to a re-ranking of 141 participating algorithms w.r.t. visual quality of interpolated frames mostly based on optical flow estimation. Our re-ranking result shows the necessity of visual quality assessment as another evaluation metric for optical flow and frame interpolation benchmarks.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
004 Computer Science
Keywords
visual quality assessment, optical flow, frame interpolation
Conference
2019 Eleventh International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), Jun 5, 2019 - Jun 7, 2019, Berlin
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
MEN, Hui, Hanhe LIN, Vlad HOSU, Daniel MAURER, Andres BRUHN, Dietmar SAUPE, 2019. Visual Quality Assessment for Motion Compensated Frame Interpolation. 2019 Eleventh International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). Berlin, Jun 5, 2019 - Jun 7, 2019. In: IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY, /, ed.. 2019 Eleventh International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) : June 5-7, 2019, Berlin, Germany. Piscataway:IEEE, pp. 197-203. ISBN 978-1-5386-8212-8. Available under: doi: 10.1109/QoMEX.2019.8743221BibTex
@inproceedings{Men2019Visua-49117, year={2019}, doi={10.1109/QoMEX.2019.8743221}, title={Visual Quality Assessment for Motion Compensated Frame Interpolation}, isbn={978-1-5386-8212-8}, publisher={IEEE}, address={Piscataway}, booktitle={2019 Eleventh International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) : June 5-7, 2019, Berlin, Germany}, pages={197--203}, editor={IEEE Computer Society, /}, author={Men, Hui and Lin, Hanhe and Hosu, Vlad and Maurer, Daniel and Bruhn, Andres and Saupe, Dietmar} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/49117"> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-03-23T09:00:48Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Bruhn, Andres</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2019</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Saupe, Dietmar</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Maurer, Daniel</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Bruhn, Andres</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Lin, Hanhe</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:title>Visual Quality Assessment for Motion Compensated Frame Interpolation</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Hosu, Vlad</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Saupe, Dietmar</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Men, Hui</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/49117"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-03-23T09:00:48Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Lin, Hanhe</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Hosu, Vlad</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/> <dc:creator>Men, Hui</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Current benchmarks for optical flow algorithms evaluate the estimation quality by comparing their predicted flow field with the ground truth, and additionally may compare interpolated frames, based on these predictions, with the correct frames from the actual image sequences. For the latter comparisons, objective measures such as mean square errors are applied. However, for applications like image interpolation, the expected user's quality of experience cannot be fully deduced from such simple quality measures. Therefore, we conducted a subjective quality assessment study by crowdsourcing for the interpolated images provided in one of the optical flow benchmarks, the Middlebury benchmark. We used paired comparisons with forced choice and reconstructed absolute quality scale values according to Thurstone's model using the classical least squares method. The results give rise to a re-ranking of 141 participating algorithms w.r.t. visual quality of interpolated frames mostly based on optical flow estimation. Our re-ranking result shows the necessity of visual quality assessment as another evaluation metric for optical flow and frame interpolation benchmarks.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/> <dc:contributor>Maurer, Daniel</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes