Clausal ellipsis : Deletion or selective spell-out?

Broekhuis, Hans; Bayer, Josef

Clausal ellipsis : Deletion or selective spell-out?

Dateien

Broekhuis_2-anhownznirs68.pdf(334.25 KB)

Datum

2020

Autor:innen

Broekhuis, Hans

Bayer, Josef

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Linguistics in the Netherlands ; 37 (2020), 1. - S. 23-37. - Benjamins. - ISSN 0929-7332. - eISSN 1569-9919

Zusammenfassung

This article compares two alternatives to the standard movement-and-deletion approach to clausal ellipsis, which postulates deletion of TP after the remnants of ellipsis are (sometimes exceptionally) A′-moved into the left periphery of the clause. One alternative is the in-situ approach, which denies the involvement of movement in the derivation of clausal ellipsis; it claims that clausal ellipsis can apply to any run-of-the-mill syntactic structure and simply deletes the familiar/given information from the propositional domain of the clause. Another alternative is the selective spell-out approach; it denies the involvement of deletion and states that the remnants undergo regular A′-movement into the specifiers of specific semantically relevant functional projections (CP, FocusP, NegP, etc.), which are subsequently selected for spell-out. This article argues that the selective spell-out approach is superior to the two deletion approaches.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

400 Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik

Schlagwörter

A′-movement, clausal ellipsis, deletion, discourse particles, spell-out

Zitieren

ISO 690

BROEKHUIS, Hans, Josef BAYER, 2020. Clausal ellipsis : Deletion or selective spell-out?. In: Linguistics in the Netherlands. Benjamins. 37(1), pp. 23-37. ISSN 0929-7332. eISSN 1569-9919. Available under: doi: 10.1075/avt.00035.bro

BibTex

@article{Broekhuis2020Claus-52949,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1075/avt.00035.bro},
  title={Clausal ellipsis : Deletion or selective spell-out?},
  number={1},
  volume={37},
  issn={0929-7332},
  journal={Linguistics in the Netherlands},
  pages={23--37},
  author={Broekhuis, Hans and Bayer, Josef}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52949">
    <dc:creator>Bayer, Josef</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52949/1/Broekhuis_2-anhownznirs68.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-02-22T08:22:51Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-02-22T08:22:51Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52949/1/Broekhuis_2-anhownznirs68.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:title>Clausal ellipsis : Deletion or selective spell-out?</dcterms:title>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This article compares two alternatives to the standard movement-and-deletion approach to clausal ellipsis, which postulates deletion of TP after the remnants of ellipsis are (sometimes exceptionally) A′-moved into the left periphery of the clause. One alternative is the in-situ approach, which denies the involvement of movement in the derivation of clausal ellipsis; it claims that clausal ellipsis can apply to any run-of-the-mill syntactic structure and simply deletes the familiar/given information from the propositional domain of the clause. Another alternative is the selective spell-out approach; it denies the involvement of deletion and states that the remnants undergo regular A′-movement into the specifiers of specific semantically relevant functional projections (CP, FocusP, NegP, etc.), which are subsequently selected for spell-out. This article argues that the selective spell-out approach is superior to the two deletion approaches.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dc:creator>Broekhuis, Hans</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dc:contributor>Broekhuis, Hans</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/52949"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Bayer, Josef</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja

Begutachtet

Unbekannt