Accountability of Public Servants at the Street Level

Sager, Fritz; Thomann, Eva; Hupe, Peter

Accountability of Public Servants at the Street Level

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2019

Autor:innen

Sager, Fritz

Thomann, Eva

Hupe, Peter

Publikationstyp

Beitrag zu einem Sammelband

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant / Sullivan, Helen; Dickinson, Helen; Henderson, Hayley (Hrsg.). - living reference work. - Cham : Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. - ISBN 978-3-030-03008-7

Zusammenfassung

Public servants are accountable to the public – as their name suggests. However, the question of accountability is not as clear as it seems. Public servants working at the street level of government bureaucracy enjoy discretion in the implementation of public policies (Thomann, van Engen and Tummers, J Public Adm Res Theory 28(4):583–601, 2018a). In the context of regulatory governance, policy implementers more often than not enforce regulation and hence are regulators at the street level. They use discretion to make decisions that ultimately define policies and regulation; and they do so along different reference systems (Thomann, Hupe, and Sager F, Governance 31:299–319, 2018b). Lipsky (Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1980, 2010) famously conceptualized the resulting dilemmas for this stratum of public servants. Maynard-Moody and Musheno (J Public Adm Res Theory 10:329–358, 2000) capture the core dilemma of those public servants’ accountability when interacting with clients with the distinction between “state agents” primarily following the law and “citizen agents” first of all addressing clients’ needs. In their accountability regimes framework, Hupe and Hill (Public Adm 85:85–102, 2007) introduce profession as third key reference institution, alongside state and society. In the course of new modes of governance, in particular contexts, private actors have gained an additional role as implementation agents. Sager et al. (Public Manage Rev 16:481–502, 2014) and Thomann et al. (2018) therefore extend the accountability regimes framework with market as central in the fourth accountability regime at the street level. The chapter presents the extended accountability regimes framework, illustrates it with empirical cases, and discusses regulatory and policy implications of the accountability dilemmas of street-level implementers.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

320 Politik

Zitieren

ISO 690

SAGER, Fritz, Eva THOMANN, Peter HUPE, 2019. Accountability of Public Servants at the Street Level. In: SULLIVAN, Helen, ed., Helen DICKINSON, ed., Hayley HENDERSON, ed.. The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant. living reference work. Cham:Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-3-030-03008-7. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-03008-7_5-1

BibTex

@incollection{Sager2019Accou-52371,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.1007/978-3-030-03008-7_5-1},
  title={Accountability of Public Servants at the Street Level},
  edition={living reference work},
  isbn={978-3-030-03008-7},
  publisher={Palgrave Macmillan},
  address={Cham},
  booktitle={The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant},
  editor={Sullivan, Helen and Dickinson, Helen and Henderson, Hayley},
  author={Sager, Fritz and Thomann, Eva and Hupe, Peter}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52371">
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/52371"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-01-12T16:18:47Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Hupe, Peter</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Public servants are accountable to the public – as their name suggests. However, the question of accountability is not as clear as it seems. Public servants working at the street level of government bureaucracy enjoy discretion in the implementation of public policies (Thomann, van Engen and Tummers, J Public Adm Res Theory 28(4):583–601, 2018a). In the context of regulatory governance, policy implementers more often than not enforce regulation and hence are regulators at the street level. They use discretion to make decisions that ultimately define policies and regulation; and they do so along different reference systems (Thomann, Hupe, and Sager F, Governance 31:299–319, 2018b). Lipsky (Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1980, 2010) famously conceptualized the resulting dilemmas for this stratum of public servants. Maynard-Moody and Musheno (J Public Adm Res Theory 10:329–358, 2000) capture the core dilemma of those public servants’ accountability when interacting with clients with the distinction between “state agents” primarily following the law and “citizen agents” first of all addressing clients’ needs. In their accountability regimes framework, Hupe and Hill (Public Adm 85:85–102, 2007) introduce profession as third key reference institution, alongside state and society. In the course of new modes of governance, in particular contexts, private actors have gained an additional role as implementation agents. Sager et al. (Public Manage Rev 16:481–502, 2014) and Thomann et al. (2018) therefore extend the accountability regimes framework with market as central in the fourth accountability regime at the street level. The chapter presents the extended accountability regimes framework, illustrates it with empirical cases, and discusses regulatory and policy implications of the accountability dilemmas of street-level implementers.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:issued>2019</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Hupe, Peter</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Thomann, Eva</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Accountability of Public Servants at the Street Level</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Thomann, Eva</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Sager, Fritz</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Sager, Fritz</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-01-12T16:18:47Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Nein