Publikation: The feedback between where we go and what we know : information shapes movement, but movement also impacts information acquisition
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
What animals know about their environment is crucial for understanding observed patterns of movement and space-use, but the feedback between information acquisition and movement is rarely considered. Animals can inherit spatial information or obtain it with their senses, via their social environment, or from direct experience. On one hand, this information affects decisions about when, where and how to move. On the other hand, movement itself shapes the information animals acquire due to effects of habitat sampling, speed-accuracy tradeoffs, and cognitive limitations. We suggest that simultaneously considering how the information animals have about their environment affects their movements and how these movements, in turn, shape the information they acquire about their habitat will provide useful insights to the field of movement ecology.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
SPIEGEL, Orr, Margaret C. CROFOOT, 2016. The feedback between where we go and what we know : information shapes movement, but movement also impacts information acquisition. In: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 2016, 12, pp. 90-96. ISSN 2352-1546. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.09.009BibTex
@article{Spiegel2016-12feedb-45913, year={2016}, doi={10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.09.009}, title={The feedback between where we go and what we know : information shapes movement, but movement also impacts information acquisition}, volume={12}, issn={2352-1546}, journal={Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences}, pages={90--96}, author={Spiegel, Orr and Crofoot, Margaret C.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45913"> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:title>The feedback between where we go and what we know : information shapes movement, but movement also impacts information acquisition</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Crofoot, Margaret C.</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/45913"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <dcterms:issued>2016-12</dcterms:issued> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Crofoot, Margaret C.</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Spiegel, Orr</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-05-24T13:10:09Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Spiegel, Orr</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-05-24T13:10:09Z</dcterms:available> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">What animals know about their environment is crucial for understanding observed patterns of movement and space-use, but the feedback between information acquisition and movement is rarely considered. Animals can inherit spatial information or obtain it with their senses, via their social environment, or from direct experience. On one hand, this information affects decisions about when, where and how to move. On the other hand, movement itself shapes the information animals acquire due to effects of habitat sampling, speed-accuracy tradeoffs, and cognitive limitations. We suggest that simultaneously considering how the information animals have about their environment affects their movements and how these movements, in turn, shape the information they acquire about their habitat will provide useful insights to the field of movement ecology.</dcterms:abstract> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>