Publikation: Working Memory and Sentence Processing : The Roles of Referentiality, Structure and Modality
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
This thesis investigates the role of working memory in sentence processing. In order to be able to successfully comprehend a sentence, it is elementary that grammatical information is buffered for a short time in order to be retrieved again at a later point in the parsing process. However, we know that the cognitive abilities of humans are very limited when it comes to buffering over the short term. The reason, why this is so, is one of the underlying questions in current psycholinguistic research. The aim of this work is to contribute to the clarification of those central questions. This will be done on the basis of own experimental work. The following three main topics will be in the focus of this thesis:
First, what is the underlying mechanism that limits capacity in working memory? Domemory traces decay over time or is interference of competing memory traces the source of forgetting over the short term?
Second, if intervening material leads to interference effects, which attributes of the interveningmaterial are crucial to an increase in sentence complexity? Is it the pure number of words or is it grammatical complexity?
Third, is there a difference between processing visual and auditory stimuli? Which influence does the modality have on understanding sentences? How does modality influence working memory processes in language parsing?
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
HOPP, Simon, 2012. Working Memory and Sentence Processing : The Roles of Referentiality, Structure and Modality [Dissertation]. Konstanz: University of KonstanzBibTex
@phdthesis{Hopp2012Worki-26592, year={2012}, title={Working Memory and Sentence Processing : The Roles of Referentiality, Structure and Modality}, author={Hopp, Simon}, address={Konstanz}, school={Universität Konstanz} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/26592"> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:creator>Hopp, Simon</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This thesis investigates the role of working memory in sentence processing. In order to be able to successfully comprehend a sentence, it is elementary that grammatical information is buffered for a short time in order to be retrieved again at a later point in the parsing process. However, we know that the cognitive abilities of humans are very limited when it comes to buffering over the short term. The reason, why this is so, is one of the underlying questions in current psycholinguistic research. The aim of this work is to contribute to the clarification of those central questions. This will be done on the basis of own experimental work. The following three main topics will be in the focus of this thesis:<br /><br /><br /><br />First, what is the underlying mechanism that limits capacity in working memory? Domemory traces decay over time or is interference of competing memory traces the source of forgetting over the short term?<br /><br /><br />Second, if intervening material leads to interference effects, which attributes of the interveningmaterial are crucial to an increase in sentence complexity? Is it the pure number of words or is it grammatical complexity?<br /><br /><br />Third, is there a difference between processing visual and auditory stimuli? Which influence does the modality have on understanding sentences? How does modality influence working memory processes in language parsing?</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/26592"/> <dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:title>Working Memory and Sentence Processing : The Roles of Referentiality, Structure and Modality</dcterms:title> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-02-26T09:30:15Z</dc:date> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/26592/1/Hopp_265922.pdf"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/26592/1/Hopp_265922.pdf"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-02-26T09:30:15Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Hopp, Simon</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>