Academic Plagiarism Detection : A Systematic Literature Review

Foltýnek, Tomáš; Meuschke, Norman; Gipp, Bela

Academic Plagiarism Detection : A Systematic Literature Review

Dateien

Foltynek_2-c4an0qynjftp7.pdfGröße: 868.24 KBDownloads: 2404

Datum

2020

Autor:innen

Foltýnek, Tomáš

Meuschke, Norman

Gipp, Bela

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

ACM Computing Surveys. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). 2020, 52(6), 112. ISSN 0360-0300. eISSN 1557-7341. Available under: doi: 10.1145/3345317

Zusammenfassung

This article summarizes the research on computational methods to detect academic plagiarism by systematically reviewing 239 research papers published between 2013 and 2018. To structure the presentation of the research contributions, we propose novel technically oriented typologies for plagiarism prevention and detection efforts, the forms of academic plagiarism, and computational plagiarism detection methods. We show that academic plagiarism detection is a highly active research field. Over the period we review, the field has seen major advances regarding the automated detection of strongly obfuscated and thus hard-to-identify forms of academic plagiarism. These improvements mainly originate from better semantic text analysis methods, the investigation of non-textual content features, and the application of machine learning. We identify a research gap in the lack of methodologically thorough performance evaluations of plagiarism detection systems. Concluding from our analysis, we see the integration of heterogeneous analysis methods for textual and non-textual content features using machine learning as the most promising area for future research contributions to improve the detection of academic plagiarism further.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

004 Informatik

Zitieren

ISO 690

FOLTÝNEK, Tomáš, Norman MEUSCHKE, Bela GIPP, 2020. Academic Plagiarism Detection : A Systematic Literature Review. In: ACM Computing Surveys. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). 2020, 52(6), 112. ISSN 0360-0300. eISSN 1557-7341. Available under: doi: 10.1145/3345317

BibTex

@article{Foltynek2020-01-21Acade-49953,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1145/3345317},
  title={Academic Plagiarism Detection : A Systematic Literature Review},
  number={6},
  volume={52},
  issn={0360-0300},
  journal={ACM Computing Surveys},
  author={Foltýnek, Tomáš and Meuschke, Norman and Gipp, Bela},
  note={Article Number: 112}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/49953">
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/49953/1/Foltynek_2-c4an0qynjftp7.pdf"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This article summarizes the research on computational methods to detect academic plagiarism by systematically reviewing 239 research papers published between 2013 and 2018. To structure the presentation of the research contributions, we propose novel technically oriented typologies for plagiarism prevention and detection efforts, the forms of academic plagiarism, and computational plagiarism detection methods. We show that academic plagiarism detection is a highly active research field. Over the period we review, the field has seen major advances regarding the automated detection of strongly obfuscated and thus hard-to-identify forms of academic plagiarism. These improvements mainly originate from better semantic text analysis methods, the investigation of non-textual content features, and the application of machine learning. We identify a research gap in the lack of methodologically thorough performance evaluations of plagiarism detection systems. Concluding from our analysis, we see the integration of heterogeneous analysis methods for textual and non-textual content features using machine learning as the most promising area for future research contributions to improve the detection of academic plagiarism further.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Gipp, Bela</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2020-01-21</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-06-22T08:10:42Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/49953/1/Foltynek_2-c4an0qynjftp7.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/49953"/>
    <dc:contributor>Foltýnek, Tomáš</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-06-22T08:10:42Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Meuschke, Norman</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Foltýnek, Tomáš</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Gipp, Bela</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Meuschke, Norman</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Academic Plagiarism Detection : A Systematic Literature Review</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Nein

Begutachtet

Unbekannt