Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of Microdochium colonizing the roots of common reed

Ernst, Michael; Neubert, Karin; Mendgen, Kurt; Wirsel, Stefan G. R.

Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of Microdochium colonizing the roots of common reed

Files

ernst 2011.pdf(313.11 KB)

Date

2011

Authors

Ernst, Michael

Neubert, Karin

Mendgen, Kurt

Wirsel, Stefan G. R.

Publication type

Journal article

Published in

BMC Microbiology ; 11 (2011), 1. - 242. - eISSN 1471-2180

Abstract

Background: Fungal endophyte communities are often comprised of many species colonizing the same host. However, little is known about the causes of this diversity. On the one hand, the apparent coexistence of closely related species may be explained by the traditional niche differentiation hypothesis, which suggests that abiotic and/or biotic factors mediate partitioning. For endophytes, such factors are difficult to identify, and are therefore in most cases unknown. On the other hand, there is the neutral hypothesis, which suggests that stochastic factors may explain high species diversity. There is a need to investigate to what extent each of these hypotheses may apply to endophytes.

Results: The niche partitioning of two closely related fungal endophytes, Microdochium bolleyi and M. phragmitis, colonizing Phragmites australis, was investigated. The occurrences of each species were assessed using specific nested-PCR assays for 251 field samples of common reed from Lake Constance, Germany. These analyses revealed niche preferences for both fungi.
From three niche factors assessed, i.e. host habitat, host organ and season, host habitat significantly differentiated the two species. M. bolleyi preferred dry habitats, whereas M. phragmitis prevailed in flooded habitats. In contrast, both species exhibited a significant preference for the same host organ, i.e. roots. Likewise the third factor, season, did not significantly distinguish the two species. Differences in carbon utilization and growth temperature could not conclusively explain the niches. The inclusion of three unrelated species of Ascomycota, which also colonize P. australis at the same locations, indicated
spatio-temporal niche partitioning between all fungi. None of the species exhibited the same preferences for all three factors, i.e. host habitat, host organ, and time of the season.

Conclusions:The fungal species colonizing common reed investigated in this study seem to exploit niche differences leading to a separation in space and time, which may allow for their coexistence on the same host. A purely neutral model is unlikely to explain the coexistence of closely related endophytes on common reed.

Subject (DDC)

570 Biosciences, Biology

Cite This

ISO 690

ERNST, Michael, Karin NEUBERT, Kurt MENDGEN, Stefan G. R. WIRSEL, 2011. Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of Microdochium colonizing the roots of common reed. In: BMC Microbiology. 11(1), 242. eISSN 1471-2180. Available under: doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-242

BibTex

@article{Ernst2011Niche-16546,
  year={2011},
  doi={10.1186/1471-2180-11-242},
  title={Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of Microdochium colonizing the roots of common reed},
  number={1},
  volume={11},
  journal={BMC Microbiology},
  author={Ernst, Michael and Neubert, Karin and Mendgen, Kurt and Wirsel, Stefan G. R.},
  note={Article Number: 242}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/16546">
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Background: Fungal endophyte communities are often comprised of many species colonizing the same host. However, little is known about the causes of this diversity. On the one hand, the apparent coexistence of closely related species may be explained by the traditional niche differentiation hypothesis, which suggests that abiotic and/or biotic factors mediate partitioning. For endophytes, such factors are difficult to identify, and are therefore in most cases unknown. On the other hand, there is the neutral hypothesis, which suggests that stochastic factors may explain high species diversity. There is a need to investigate to what extent each of these hypotheses may apply to endophytes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Results: The niche partitioning of two closely related fungal endophytes, Microdochium bolleyi and M. phragmitis, colonizing Phragmites australis, was investigated. The occurrences of each species were assessed using specific nested-PCR assays for 251 field samples of common reed from Lake Constance, Germany. These analyses revealed niche preferences for both fungi.&lt;br /&gt;From three niche factors assessed, i.e. host habitat, host organ and season, host habitat significantly differentiated the two species. M. bolleyi preferred dry habitats, whereas M. phragmitis prevailed in flooded habitats. In contrast, both species exhibited a significant preference for the same host organ, i.e. roots. Likewise the third factor, season, did not significantly distinguish the two species. Differences in carbon utilization and growth temperature could not conclusively explain the niches. The inclusion of three unrelated species of Ascomycota, which also colonize P. australis at the same locations, indicated&lt;br /&gt;spatio-temporal niche partitioning between all fungi. None of the species exhibited the same preferences for all three factors, i.e. host habitat, host organ, and time of the season.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conclusions:The fungal species colonizing common reed investigated in this study seem to exploit niche differences leading to a separation in space and time, which may allow for their coexistence on the same host. A purely neutral model is unlikely to explain the coexistence of closely related endophytes on common reed.</dcterms:abstract>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Ernst, Michael</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Mendgen, Kurt</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of Microdochium colonizing the roots of common reed</dcterms:title>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-11-10T09:37:36Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:creator>Ernst, Michael</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Wirsel, Stefan G. R.</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/16546/2/ernst%202011.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Mendgen, Kurt</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Wirsel, Stefan G. R.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Neubert, Karin</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Neubert, Karin</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2011</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: BMC Microbiology (2011). - 11:242</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/16546/2/ernst%202011.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/16546"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-11-10T09:37:36Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Bibliography of Konstanz

Yes