Publikation: A Comparison between Political Claims Analysis and Discourse Network Analysis : The Case of Software Patents in the European Union
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
The study of policy discourse comprises actor-centered and content-oriented approaches. We attempt to close the gap between the two kinds of approaches by introducing a new methodology for the analysis of political discourse called Discourse Network Analysis. It is based on social network analysis and qualitative content analysis and takes an entirely relational perspective. Political discourse can be analyzed in a dynamic way, and the approach makes previously unobservable cleavage lines and alignments measurable at the actor level, at the level of the contents of a discourse, and a combined layer. We compare discourse network analysis with political claims analysis, a competing method, and apply both methods to the European-level discourse on software patents. Our results demonstrate how an anti-software-patent coalition was mobilized and how it gained control over important frames, while the well-organized pro-software-patent discourse coalition was not able to gain sovereignty over the discourse.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
LEIFELD, Philip, Sebastian HAUNSS, 2010. A Comparison between Political Claims Analysis and Discourse Network Analysis : The Case of Software Patents in the European UnionBibTex
@unpublished{Leifeld2010Compa-4204,
year={2010},
title={A Comparison between Political Claims Analysis and Discourse Network Analysis : The Case of Software Patents in the European Union},
author={Leifeld, Philip and Haunss, Sebastian}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/4204">
<dcterms:title>A Comparison between Political Claims Analysis and Discourse Network Analysis : The Case of Software Patents in the European Union</dcterms:title>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/4204"/>
<dc:contributor>Leifeld, Philip</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Haunss, Sebastian</dc:creator>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:13:04Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The study of policy discourse comprises actor-centered and content-oriented approaches. We attempt to close the gap between the two kinds of approaches by introducing a new methodology for the analysis of political discourse called Discourse Network Analysis. It is based on social network analysis and qualitative content analysis and takes an entirely relational perspective. Political discourse can be analyzed in a dynamic way, and the approach makes previously unobservable cleavage lines and alignments measurable at the actor level, at the level of the contents of a discourse, and a combined layer. We compare discourse network analysis with political claims analysis, a competing method, and apply both methods to the European-level discourse on software patents. Our results demonstrate how an anti-software-patent coalition was mobilized and how it gained control over important frames, while the well-organized pro-software-patent discourse coalition was not able to gain sovereignty over the discourse.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:contributor>Haunss, Sebastian</dc:contributor>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/4204/1/2010_21online.pdf"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dc:creator>Leifeld, Philip</dc:creator>
<dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/4204/1/2010_21online.pdf"/>
<dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:13:04Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
