Publikation: Collaborative Document Evaluation : An Alternative Approach to Classic Peer Review
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Research papers are usually evaluated via peer review. However, peer review has limitations in evaluating research papers. In this paper, Scienstein and the new idea of 'collaborative document evaluation' are presented. Scienstein is a project to evaluate scientific papers collaboratively based on ratings, links, annotations and classifications by the scientific community using the internet. In this paper, critical success factors of collaborative document evaluation are analyzed. That is the scientists- motivation to participate as reviewers, the reviewers- competence and the reviewers- trustworthiness. It is shown that if these factors are ensured, collaborative document evaluation may prove to be a more objective, faster and less resource intensive approach to scientific document evaluation in comparison to the classical peer review process. It is shown that additional advantages exist as collaborative document evaluation supports interdisciplinary work, allows continuous post-publishing quality assessments and enables the implementation of academic recommendation engines. In the long term, it seems possible that collaborative document evaluation will successively substitute peer review and decrease the need for journals.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BEEL, Jöran, Bela GIPP, 2008. Collaborative Document Evaluation : An Alternative Approach to Classic Peer Review. In: Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 2008, 2(5), pp. 353-356. ISSN 1307-6892BibTex
@article{Beel2008Colla-31451, year={2008}, title={Collaborative Document Evaluation : An Alternative Approach to Classic Peer Review}, url={http://waset.org/publication/Collaborative-Document-Evaluation:-An-Alternative-Approach-to-Classic-Peer-Review/8129}, number={5}, volume={2}, issn={1307-6892}, journal={Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology}, pages={353--356}, author={Beel, Jöran and Gipp, Bela} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31451"> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-07-19T05:07:21Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Research papers are usually evaluated via peer review. However, peer review has limitations in evaluating research papers. In this paper, Scienstein and the new idea of 'collaborative document evaluation' are presented. Scienstein is a project to evaluate scientific papers collaboratively based on ratings, links, annotations and classifications by the scientific community using the internet. In this paper, critical success factors of collaborative document evaluation are analyzed. That is the scientists- motivation to participate as reviewers, the reviewers- competence and the reviewers- trustworthiness. It is shown that if these factors are ensured, collaborative document evaluation may prove to be a more objective, faster and less resource intensive approach to scientific document evaluation in comparison to the classical peer review process. It is shown that additional advantages exist as collaborative document evaluation supports interdisciplinary work, allows continuous post-publishing quality assessments and enables the implementation of academic recommendation engines. In the long term, it seems possible that collaborative document evaluation will successively substitute peer review and decrease the need for journals.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Gipp, Bela</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/31451"/> <dc:contributor>Beel, Jöran</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-07-19T05:07:21Z</dc:date> <dcterms:title>Collaborative Document Evaluation : An Alternative Approach to Classic Peer Review</dcterms:title> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Gipp, Bela</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/> <dc:creator>Beel, Jöran</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>