Counterfactual reasoning : from childhood to adulthood
Counterfactual reasoning : from childhood to adulthood
Loading...
Date
2013
Authors
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
URI (citable link)
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published
Published in
Journal of experimental child psychology ; 114 (2013), 3. - pp. 389-404. - Elsevier. - ISSN 0022-0965. - eISSN 1096-0457
Abstract
The objective of this study was to describe the developmental progression of counterfactual reasoning from childhood to adulthood. In contrast to the traditional view, it was recently reported by Rafetseder and colleagues that even a majority of 6-year-old children do not engage in counterfactual reasoning when asked counterfactual questions (Child Development, 2010, Vol. 81, pp. 376-389). By continuing to use the same method, the main result of the current Study 1 was that performance of the 9- to 11-year-olds was comparable to that of the 6-year-olds, whereas the 12- to 14-year-olds approximated adult performance. Study 2, using an intuitively simpler task based on Harris and colleagues (Cognition, 1996, Vol. 61, pp. 233-259), resulted in a similar conclusion, specifically that the ability to apply counterfactual reasoning is not fully developed in all children before 12 years of age. We conclude that children who failed our tasks seem to lack an understanding of what needs to be changed (events that are causally dependent on the counterfactual assumption) and what needs to be left unchanged and so needs to be kept as it actually happened. Alternative explanations, particularly executive functioning, are discussed in detail.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
150 Psychology
Keywords
counterfactual reasoning, basic conditional reasoning, executive functioning, childhood, adulthood, nearest possible world constraint
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
RAFETSEDER, Eva, Maria SCHWITALLA, Josef PERNER, 2013. Counterfactual reasoning : from childhood to adulthood. In: Journal of experimental child psychology. Elsevier. 114(3), pp. 389-404. ISSN 0022-0965. eISSN 1096-0457. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.010BibTex
@article{Rafetseder2013-03Count-52725, year={2013}, doi={10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.010}, title={Counterfactual reasoning : from childhood to adulthood}, number={3}, volume={114}, issn={0022-0965}, journal={Journal of experimental child psychology}, pages={389--404}, author={Rafetseder, Eva and Schwitalla, Maria and Perner, Josef} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52725"> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-02-04T15:17:43Z</dcterms:available> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The objective of this study was to describe the developmental progression of counterfactual reasoning from childhood to adulthood. In contrast to the traditional view, it was recently reported by Rafetseder and colleagues that even a majority of 6-year-old children do not engage in counterfactual reasoning when asked counterfactual questions (Child Development, 2010, Vol. 81, pp. 376-389). By continuing to use the same method, the main result of the current Study 1 was that performance of the 9- to 11-year-olds was comparable to that of the 6-year-olds, whereas the 12- to 14-year-olds approximated adult performance. Study 2, using an intuitively simpler task based on Harris and colleagues (Cognition, 1996, Vol. 61, pp. 233-259), resulted in a similar conclusion, specifically that the ability to apply counterfactual reasoning is not fully developed in all children before 12 years of age. We conclude that children who failed our tasks seem to lack an understanding of what needs to be changed (events that are causally dependent on the counterfactual assumption) and what needs to be left unchanged and so needs to be kept as it actually happened. Alternative explanations, particularly executive functioning, are discussed in detail.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Perner, Josef</dc:contributor> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/"/> <dc:creator>Schwitalla, Maria</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-02-04T15:17:43Z</dc:date> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:contributor>Schwitalla, Maria</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>Counterfactual reasoning : from childhood to adulthood</dcterms:title> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:creator>Rafetseder, Eva</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2013-03</dcterms:issued> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52725/3/Rafetseder_2-f1o5sflgk0419.pdf"/> <dc:creator>Perner, Josef</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52725/3/Rafetseder_2-f1o5sflgk0419.pdf"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/52725"/> <dc:contributor>Rafetseder, Eva</dc:contributor> <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported</dc:rights> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes
Refereed
Yes