Food for thought ... considerations and guidelines for basic test method descriptions in toxicology

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Leist_food for thougt.pdf
Leist_food for thougt.pdfGröße: 4.93 MBDownloads: 543
Datum
2010
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
European Union (EU): 201619
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Alternatives to animal experimentation : ALTEX. 2010, 27(4), pp. 309-317
Zusammenfassung

The development and application of new test systems and test methods is central to the progress of in vitro toxicology. In order to live up to the future challenges, it is important to use the vast knowledge of adjoining fields, such as cell biology or developmental biology, and to attract specialists from such areas to develop new methods. Not all of them bring with them the necessary experience and training required for the development of toxicological test systems. Thus, promising new biological test systems sometimes still require additional considerations to become successful. Sometimes even the referees of scientific journals and their editors seem to lack judgement guidelines for minimum performance standards. Here we provide a list of points to be considered for the establishment of a test method. The chapters range from the explanation of the meaning of positive controls, performance standards or signal-noise ratios to a discussion of statistical considerations, suitable solvents and data display formats. The considerations are simple and expressed in a non-mathematical format, with a strong focus on plausibility and common sense. The major intention of this article is to provide a compilation of important issues requiring consideration. Whether they apply to a specific system and whether action is required must be determined by individual judgement.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie
Schlagwörter
test system, validation, quality control, data presentation, assay design
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690LEIST, Marcel, Liudmila EFREMOVA, Christiaan KARREMAN, 2010. Food for thought ... considerations and guidelines for basic test method descriptions in toxicology. In: Alternatives to animal experimentation : ALTEX. 2010, 27(4), pp. 309-317
BibTex
@article{Leist2010thoug-18153,
  year={2010},
  title={Food for thought ... considerations and guidelines for basic test method descriptions in toxicology},
  number={4},
  volume={27},
  journal={Alternatives to animal experimentation : ALTEX},
  pages={309--317},
  author={Leist, Marcel and Efremova, Liudmila and Karreman, Christiaan}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/18153">
    <dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Leist, Marcel</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Karreman, Christiaan</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/18153/2/Leist_food%20for%20thougt.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Leist, Marcel</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-01-31T15:31:52Z</dcterms:available>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Efremova, Liudmila</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/18153"/>
    <dc:contributor>Efremova, Liudmila</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Karreman, Christiaan</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Food for thought ... considerations and guidelines for basic test method descriptions in toxicology</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The development and application of new test systems and test methods is central to the progress of in vitro toxicology. In order to live up to the future challenges, it is important to use the vast knowledge of adjoining fields, such as cell biology or developmental biology, and to attract specialists from such areas to develop new methods. Not all of them bring with them the necessary experience and training required for the development of toxicological test systems. Thus, promising new biological test systems sometimes still require additional considerations to become successful. Sometimes even the referees of scientific journals and their editors seem to lack judgement guidelines for minimum performance standards. Here we provide a list of points to be considered for the establishment of a test method. The chapters range from the explanation of the meaning of positive controls, performance standards or signal-noise ratios to a discussion of statistical considerations, suitable solvents and data display formats. The considerations are simple and expressed in a non-mathematical format, with a strong focus on plausibility and common sense. The major intention of this article is to provide a compilation of important issues requiring consideration. Whether they apply to a specific system and whether action is required must be determined by individual judgement.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-01-31T15:31:52Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: Alternatives to animal experimentation : ALTEX ; 27 (2010), 4. - pp. 309-317</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/18153/2/Leist_food%20for%20thougt.pdf"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen