Buying Supermajorities in the Lab
Buying Supermajorities in the Lab
No Thumbnail Available
Files
There are no files associated with this item.
Date
2019
Authors
Schneider, Maik T.
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
IZA Discussion Papers; 12477
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Title in another language
Publication type
Working Paper/Technical Report
Publication status
Published
Published in
Abstract
Many decisions taken in legislatures or committees are subject to lobbying efforts. A seminal contribution to the literature on vote-buying is the legislative lobbying model pioneered by Groseclose and Snyder (1996), which predicts that lobbies will optimally form supermajorities in many cases. Providing the first empirical assessment of this prominent model, we test its central predictions in the laboratory. While the model assumes sequential moves, we relax this assumption in additional treatments with simultaneous moves. We find that lobbies buy supermajorities as predicted by the theory. Our results also provide supporting evidence for most comparative statics predictions of the legislative lobbying model with respect to lobbies' willingness to pay and legislators' preferences. Most of these results carry over to the simultaneous-move set-up but the predictive power of the model declines.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
330 Economics
Keywords
legislative lobbying, vote-buying, Colonel Blotto, multi-battlefield contests, experimental political economy
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
FEHRLER, Sebastian, Maik T. SCHNEIDER, 2019. Buying Supermajorities in the LabBibTex
@techreport{Fehrler2019Buyin-50218, year={2019}, series={IZA Discussion Papers}, title={Buying Supermajorities in the Lab}, number={12477}, url={https://www.iza.org/de/publications/dp/12477/buying-supermajorities-in-the-lab}, author={Fehrler, Sebastian and Schneider, Maik T.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/50218"> <dc:creator>Fehrler, Sebastian</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:contributor>Schneider, Maik T.</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50218"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:contributor>Fehrler, Sebastian</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/> <dc:creator>Schneider, Maik T.</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>Buying Supermajorities in the Lab</dcterms:title> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-07-13T11:23:19Z</dc:date> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-07-13T11:23:19Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:issued>2019</dcterms:issued> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Many decisions taken in legislatures or committees are subject to lobbying efforts. A seminal contribution to the literature on vote-buying is the legislative lobbying model pioneered by Groseclose and Snyder (1996), which predicts that lobbies will optimally form supermajorities in many cases. Providing the first empirical assessment of this prominent model, we test its central predictions in the laboratory. While the model assumes sequential moves, we relax this assumption in additional treatments with simultaneous moves. We find that lobbies buy supermajorities as predicted by the theory. Our results also provide supporting evidence for most comparative statics predictions of the legislative lobbying model with respect to lobbies' willingness to pay and legislators' preferences. Most of these results carry over to the simultaneous-move set-up but the predictive power of the model declines.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
URL of original publication
Test date of URL
2020-07-13
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes