A Bird’s Eye View on ECJ Judgments on Immigration, Asylum and Border Control Cases
A Bird’s Eye View on ECJ Judgments on Immigration, Asylum and Border Control Cases
No Thumbnail Available
Files
There are no files associated with this item.
Date
2019
Authors
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
oops
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published
Published in
European Journal of Migration and Law ; 21 (2019), 2. - pp. 166-193. - ISSN 1388-364X. - eISSN 1571-8166
Abstract
Many experts of EU migration law deal with ECJ judgments on a regular basis, but they rarely reflect on how individual rulings on diverse themes such as asylum, family reunification or return relate to each other. This article fills that gap and presents a horizontal analysis of 155 judgments combining quantitative and qualitative findings. Our statistical survey shows that selected themes and references from certain countries dominate the ECJ’s activities. In qualitative terms, the article considers three overarching themes: the concept of public policy; the practice of statutory interpretation, including in light of objectives: the principle of proportionality and interaction with domestic courts. Our study shows that the search for cross-sectoral coherence defines much of the case law, although success of this venture is compromised by enduring inconsistencies, which complicate the emergence of a reliable and predictable judicial approach towards the interpretation of secondary legislation on migration.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
340 Law
Keywords
ECJ; case law; preliminary reference; EU law; interpretation; public policy; secondary legislation; proportionality
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
THYM, Daniel, 2019. A Bird’s Eye View on ECJ Judgments on Immigration, Asylum and Border Control Cases. In: European Journal of Migration and Law. 21(2), pp. 166-193. ISSN 1388-364X. eISSN 1571-8166. Available under: doi: 10.1163/15718166-12340046BibTex
@article{Thym2019-05-07Birds-46059, year={2019}, doi={10.1163/15718166-12340046}, title={A Bird’s Eye View on ECJ Judgments on Immigration, Asylum and Border Control Cases}, number={2}, volume={21}, issn={1388-364X}, journal={European Journal of Migration and Law}, pages={166--193}, author={Thym, Daniel} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46059"> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-06-19T12:49:44Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Thym, Daniel</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2019-05-07</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Many experts of EU migration law deal with ECJ judgments on a regular basis, but they rarely reflect on how individual rulings on diverse themes such as asylum, family reunification or return relate to each other. This article fills that gap and presents a horizontal analysis of 155 judgments combining quantitative and qualitative findings. Our statistical survey shows that selected themes and references from certain countries dominate the ECJ’s activities. In qualitative terms, the article considers three overarching themes: the concept of public policy; the practice of statutory interpretation, including in light of objectives: the principle of proportionality and interaction with domestic courts. Our study shows that the search for cross-sectoral coherence defines much of the case law, although success of this venture is compromised by enduring inconsistencies, which complicate the emergence of a reliable and predictable judicial approach towards the interpretation of secondary legislation on migration.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-06-19T12:49:44Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Thym, Daniel</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/46059"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:title>A Bird’s Eye View on ECJ Judgments on Immigration, Asylum and Border Control Cases</dcterms:title> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes
Refereed
Unknown