Publikation: Probability of Responding : A Return to the Original Brunswik
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2015
Autor:innen
Athanasou, James Anthony
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Psychological Thought. PsychOpen. 2015, 8(1), pp. 7-16. eISSN 2193-7281. Available under: doi: 10.5964/psyct.v8i1.123
Zusammenfassung
This paper traces the conceptual foundations of the Brunswik based Social Judgment Theory. The historical transition from measurement through probability of responding (i.e., a constancy ratio) to measurement via correlations is documented. It is shown that there are substantive limitations with the correlation approach for the idiographic analysis of human perception or decision-making. Instead, the constancy ratio developed originally by Brunswik as well as the measurement of the probability of accuracy in responding are better suited to the analysis of human responding under conditions of uncertainty and complexity. These measures are relevant for the development of psychological laws of individual responding. It was concluded that focusing on the probability of individual responses to situations through analysing the pattern of responding intensively is more consistent with the original approach of Brunswik.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
Brunswik; probability; constancy ratio; lens model; judgment analysis
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
ATHANASOU, James Anthony, Esther KAUFMANN, 2015. Probability of Responding : A Return to the Original Brunswik. In: Psychological Thought. PsychOpen. 2015, 8(1), pp. 7-16. eISSN 2193-7281. Available under: doi: 10.5964/psyct.v8i1.123BibTex
@article{Athanasou2015Proba-55553,
year={2015},
doi={10.5964/psyct.v8i1.123},
title={Probability of Responding : A Return to the Original Brunswik},
number={1},
volume={8},
journal={Psychological Thought},
pages={7--16},
author={Athanasou, James Anthony and Kaufmann, Esther}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55553">
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:title>Probability of Responding : A Return to the Original Brunswik</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-11-16T10:18:33Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55553"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<dc:contributor>Athanasou, James Anthony</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Kaufmann, Esther</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Kaufmann, Esther</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Athanasou, James Anthony</dc:creator>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55553/3/Athanasou_2-i5deuyz28zo83.pdf"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-11-16T10:18:33Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper traces the conceptual foundations of the Brunswik based Social Judgment Theory. The historical transition from measurement through probability of responding (i.e., a constancy ratio) to measurement via correlations is documented. It is shown that there are substantive limitations with the correlation approach for the idiographic analysis of human perception or decision-making. Instead, the constancy ratio developed originally by Brunswik as well as the measurement of the probability of accuracy in responding are better suited to the analysis of human responding under conditions of uncertainty and complexity. These measures are relevant for the development of psychological laws of individual responding. It was concluded that focusing on the probability of individual responses to situations through analysing the pattern of responding intensively is more consistent with the original approach of Brunswik.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55553/3/Athanasou_2-i5deuyz28zo83.pdf"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
