Publikation:

Probability of Responding : A Return to the Original Brunswik

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Athanasou_2-i5deuyz28zo83.pdf
Athanasou_2-i5deuyz28zo83.pdfGröße: 541.87 KBDownloads: 110

Datum

2015

Autor:innen

Athanasou, James Anthony

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Psychological Thought. PsychOpen. 2015, 8(1), pp. 7-16. eISSN 2193-7281. Available under: doi: 10.5964/psyct.v8i1.123

Zusammenfassung

This paper traces the conceptual foundations of the Brunswik based Social Judgment Theory. The historical transition from measurement through probability of responding (i.e., a constancy ratio) to measurement via correlations is documented. It is shown that there are substantive limitations with the correlation approach for the idiographic analysis of human perception or decision-making. Instead, the constancy ratio developed originally by Brunswik as well as the measurement of the probability of accuracy in responding are better suited to the analysis of human responding under conditions of uncertainty and complexity. These measures are relevant for the development of psychological laws of individual responding. It was concluded that focusing on the probability of individual responses to situations through analysing the pattern of responding intensively is more consistent with the original approach of Brunswik.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

Brunswik; probability; constancy ratio; lens model; judgment analysis

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690ATHANASOU, James Anthony, Esther KAUFMANN, 2015. Probability of Responding : A Return to the Original Brunswik. In: Psychological Thought. PsychOpen. 2015, 8(1), pp. 7-16. eISSN 2193-7281. Available under: doi: 10.5964/psyct.v8i1.123
BibTex
@article{Athanasou2015Proba-55553,
  year={2015},
  doi={10.5964/psyct.v8i1.123},
  title={Probability of Responding : A Return to the Original Brunswik},
  number={1},
  volume={8},
  journal={Psychological Thought},
  pages={7--16},
  author={Athanasou, James Anthony and Kaufmann, Esther}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55553">
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:title>Probability of Responding : A Return to the Original Brunswik</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-11-16T10:18:33Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55553"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Athanasou, James Anthony</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Kaufmann, Esther</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Kaufmann, Esther</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Athanasou, James Anthony</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55553/3/Athanasou_2-i5deuyz28zo83.pdf"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-11-16T10:18:33Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper traces the conceptual foundations of the Brunswik based Social Judgment Theory. The historical transition from measurement through probability of responding (i.e., a constancy ratio) to measurement via correlations is documented. It is shown that there are substantive limitations with the correlation approach for the idiographic analysis of human perception or decision-making. Instead, the constancy ratio developed originally by Brunswik as well as the measurement of the probability of accuracy in responding are better suited to the analysis of human responding under conditions of uncertainty and complexity. These measures are relevant for the development of psychological laws of individual responding. It was concluded that focusing on the probability of individual responses to situations through analysing the pattern of responding intensively is more consistent with the original approach of Brunswik.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55553/3/Athanasou_2-i5deuyz28zo83.pdf"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen