Publikation: Interests and resources : the formation of national positions regarding EU-policies
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
The leading research question of this comparative, quantitative study is, whether the influence of interest groups on the formation of national positions on EU-policies is better explained by the environment of an actor (system of interest intermediation or policy field) or by individual attributes of his (resources). Mixed evidence was found: On the one hand, we did not find strong evidence for systemic differences, when controlling for other factors. On the other hand, we did find no evidence for the impact of individual attributes (in terms of the possession of resources).
The analysis has been performed using descriptive statistics, analysis of co- variance and multiple regression analysis. The data used are from the research project The Relevance of Threats and Promises in EU Decision making (Th. König/ G. Schneider, University of Konstanz, funded by the German national science foundation). The dataset contains information regarding 15 Commission proposals (117 issues) in Germany, Great Britain, Finland and The Netherlands for the period 1998/9.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
WARNTJEN, Andreas, 2002. Interests and resources : the formation of national positions regarding EU-policies [Master thesis]BibTex
@mastersthesis{Warntjen2002Inter-3904,
year={2002},
title={Interests and resources : the formation of national positions regarding EU-policies},
author={Warntjen, Andreas}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/3904">
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3904/1/M.A._Arbeit_Warntjen.pdf"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:09:34Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:title>Interests and resources : the formation of national positions regarding EU-policies</dcterms:title>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dc:contributor>Warntjen, Andreas</dc:contributor>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3904/1/M.A._Arbeit_Warntjen.pdf"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:creator>Warntjen, Andreas</dc:creator>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/3904"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:09:34Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:issued>2002</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The leading research question of this comparative, quantitative study is, whether the influence of interest groups on the formation of national positions on EU-policies is better explained by the environment of an actor (system of interest intermediation or policy field) or by individual attributes of his (resources). Mixed evidence was found: On the one hand, we did not find strong evidence for systemic differences, when controlling for other factors. On the other hand, we did find no evidence for the impact of individual attributes (in terms of the possession of resources).<br />The analysis has been performed using descriptive statistics, analysis of co- variance and multiple regression analysis. The data used are from the research project The Relevance of Threats and Promises in EU Decision making (Th. König/ G. Schneider, University of Konstanz, funded by the German national science foundation). The dataset contains information regarding 15 Commission proposals (117 issues) in Germany, Great Britain, Finland and The Netherlands for the period 1998/9.</dcterms:abstract>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
