Publikation: The specificity of prospective memory costs
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
A current issue in the field of prospective memory (i.e., memory for intentions) is the extent to which intentions interfere with ongoing activities. A question of interest is whether this interference is specific to stimuli that are relevant to the intention or whether interference is more general in its influence. Participants performed a lexical decision task (LDT) with an embedded prospective memory (PM) task in which they had to remember to press a computer key if a pre-specified target appeared (e.g., GIRL). Results demonstrated a consistent pattern of results. Increased reaction time costs were observed on trials where there was a match between PM targets and non-target ongoing stimuli. That is, when a prospective memory target was a word, then reaction time costs were observed on non-target word LDT trials and there were no costs on non-target nonword trials. Similarly, if a PM target was a nonword (e.g., UEBL) then costs were observed on non-target nonword LDT trials relative to non-target word trials. Evidence from three experiments suggests that task interference is specific to the type of stimulus (word or nonword) that is relevant to the intention. We refer to this finding as a Stimulus Specific Interference Effect (SSIE).
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
COHEN, Anna-Lisa, Alexander JAUDAS, Evan HIRSCHHORN, Yoni SOBIN, Peter M. GOLLWITZER, 2012. The specificity of prospective memory costs. In: Memory. 2012, 20(8), pp. 848-864. ISSN 0965-8211. eISSN 1464-0686. Available under: doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.710637BibTex
@article{Cohen2012speci-21915,
year={2012},
doi={10.1080/09658211.2012.710637},
title={The specificity of prospective memory costs},
number={8},
volume={20},
issn={0965-8211},
journal={Memory},
pages={848--864},
author={Cohen, Anna-Lisa and Jaudas, Alexander and Hirschhorn, Evan and Sobin, Yoni and Gollwitzer, Peter M.}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/21915">
<dc:creator>Sobin, Yoni</dc:creator>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:contributor>Cohen, Anna-Lisa</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Memory ; 20 (2012), 8. - S. 848-864</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
<dc:contributor>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Hirschhorn, Evan</dc:creator>
<dcterms:title>The specificity of prospective memory costs</dcterms:title>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">A current issue in the field of prospective memory (i.e., memory for intentions) is the extent to which intentions interfere with ongoing activities. A question of interest is whether this interference is specific to stimuli that are relevant to the intention or whether interference is more general in its influence. Participants performed a lexical decision task (LDT) with an embedded prospective memory (PM) task in which they had to remember to press a computer key if a pre-specified target appeared (e.g., GIRL). Results demonstrated a consistent pattern of results. Increased reaction time costs were observed on trials where there was a match between PM targets and non-target ongoing stimuli. That is, when a prospective memory target was a word, then reaction time costs were observed on non-target word LDT trials and there were no costs on non-target nonword trials. Similarly, if a PM target was a nonword (e.g., UEBL) then costs were observed on non-target nonword LDT trials relative to non-target word trials. Evidence from three experiments suggests that task interference is specific to the type of stimulus (word or nonword) that is relevant to the intention. We refer to this finding as a Stimulus Specific Interference Effect (SSIE).</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:creator>Cohen, Anna-Lisa</dc:creator>
<dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued>
<dc:contributor>Hirschhorn, Evan</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Jaudas, Alexander</dc:creator>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-02-19T07:10:27Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dc:contributor>Jaudas, Alexander</dc:contributor>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:creator>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:creator>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<dc:contributor>Sobin, Yoni</dc:contributor>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/21915"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-02-19T07:10:27Z</dcterms:available>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
