Publikation:

What the new loss and damage fund needs for public approval : choice experimental evidence from Austria

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Bottner_2-j4ygxq86nubb7.pdf
Bottner_2-j4ygxq86nubb7.pdfGröße: 1.22 MBDownloads: ?

Datum

2025

Autor:innen

Bottner, Florian
Ohndorf, Markus
Steiger, Robert

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz
oops

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

31. Januar 2026

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Climatic Change. Springer . 2025, 178(1), 9. ISSN 0165-0009. eISSN 1573-1480. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1007/s10584-024-03843-x

Zusammenfassung

The severity of extreme weather events is increasing due to climate change. While industrialized nations have historically contributed the most to greenhouse gas emissions and are thus considered the primary polluters, the adverse impacts of climate change are disproportionately felt in low-income countries with limited capacity to cope. These regions are generally less resilient to extreme weather, resulting in significant damage. Many vulnerable countries lack the resources to manage these losses independently, necessitating international financial support. For over 30 years, the allocation of these costs has been a central issue at UN climate conferences. At COP 27 and COP 28, an international fund was established to address climate-induced losses and damages. However, key details regarding payment obligations and the distribution of funds remain unresolved. Securing consistent funding requires public approval in donor countries. To understand public preferences, we conducted a representative choice experiment in Austria exploring various financing options for such a fund. Our findings suggest that public support is higher if contributions are based on principles of responsibility rather than voluntary donations, with a preference for disaster relief payments. Additionally, respondents favored a maximum monthly contribution of 30 € per capita and prioritized funding for slow-onset events over rapid-onset events.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690BOTTNER, Florian, Viktoria JANSESBERGER, Markus OHNDORF, Gabriele SPILKER, Robert STEIGER, 2025. What the new loss and damage fund needs for public approval : choice experimental evidence from Austria. In: Climatic Change. Springer . 2025, 178(1), 9. ISSN 0165-0009. eISSN 1573-1480. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1007/s10584-024-03843-x
BibTex
@article{Bottner2025-01damag-71962,
  title={What the new loss and damage fund needs for public approval : choice experimental evidence from Austria},
  year={2025},
  doi={10.1007/s10584-024-03843-x},
  number={1},
  volume={178},
  issn={0165-0009},
  journal={Climatic Change},
  author={Bottner, Florian and Jansesberger, Viktoria and Ohndorf, Markus and Spilker, Gabriele and Steiger, Robert},
  note={PDF zur weiteren Bearbeitung im Hiwi-Ordner, rechtl. Bed.: Postprint mit Embargo bis 31.1.26 (Sherpa), 20.1.25 sw***PDF angehängt, mit Sperre, 22.1.25, reh Article Number: 9}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71962">
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/71962/1/Bottner_2-j4ygxq86nubb7.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Spilker, Gabriele</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Ohndorf, Markus</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Spilker, Gabriele</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Ohndorf, Markus</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/71962/1/Bottner_2-j4ygxq86nubb7.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/71962"/>
    <dc:creator>Steiger, Robert</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Jansesberger, Viktoria</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2025-01</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:title>What the new loss and damage fund needs for public approval : choice experimental evidence from Austria</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract>The severity of extreme weather events is increasing due to climate change. While industrialized nations have historically contributed the most to greenhouse gas emissions and are thus considered the primary polluters, the adverse impacts of climate change are disproportionately felt in low-income countries with limited capacity to cope. These regions are generally less resilient to extreme weather, resulting in significant damage. Many vulnerable countries lack the resources to manage these losses independently, necessitating international financial support. For over 30 years, the allocation of these costs has been a central issue at UN climate conferences. At COP 27 and COP 28, an international fund was established to address climate-induced losses and damages. However, key details regarding payment obligations and the distribution of funds remain unresolved. Securing consistent funding requires public approval in donor countries. To understand public preferences, we conducted a representative choice experiment in Austria exploring various financing options for such a fund. Our findings suggest that public support is higher if contributions are based on principles of responsibility rather than voluntary donations, with a preference for disaster relief payments. Additionally, respondents favored a maximum monthly contribution of 30 € per capita and prioritized funding for slow-onset events over rapid-onset events.</dcterms:abstract>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Steiger, Robert</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-01-20T08:50:56Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Bottner, Florian</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jansesberger, Viktoria</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:contributor>Bottner, Florian</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-01-20T08:50:56Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

PDF zur weiteren Bearbeitung im Hiwi-Ordner, rechtl. Bed.: Postprint mit Embargo bis 31.1.26 (Sherpa), 20.1.25 sw***PDF angehängt, mit Sperre, 22.1.25, reh
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen