Sequential Torts and Bilateral Harm

dc.contributor.authorFriehe, Tim
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-23T09:36:08Zdeu
dc.date.available2011-03-23T09:36:08Zdeu
dc.date.issued2009deu
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyzes care incentives of individuals in a bilateral-harm setting if care choices are sequential. We find that the efficient outcome is not guaranteed under any liability rule considered, irrespective of whether information is perfect or imperfect. Furthermore, it is no longer possible to generally rank liability rules according to their induced social costs. These findings are in strong contrast to the sequential-torts setting in which harm is unilateral.eng
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.identifier.citationPubl. in: International Review of Law & Economics 29 (2009), 2, pp. 161-168deu
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.irle.2008.10.002
dc.identifier.urihttp://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/1839
dc.language.isoengdeu
dc.legacy.dateIssued2009deu
dc.rightsterms-of-usedeu
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/deu
dc.subjectCare incentivesdeu
dc.subjectSequential caredeu
dc.subjectBilateral harmdeu
dc.subjectTort lawdeu
dc.subject.ddc330deu
dc.subject.jelH23 - Extedeu
dc.subject.jelC72 - Noncdeu
dc.subject.jelK13 - Tortdeu
dc.titleSequential Torts and Bilateral Harmeng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEdeu
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Friehe2009Seque-1839,
  year={2009},
  doi={10.1016/j.irle.2008.10.002},
  title={Sequential Torts and Bilateral Harm},
  number={2},
  volume={29},
  journal={International Review of Law & Economics},
  pages={161--168},
  author={Friehe, Tim}
}
kops.citation.iso690FRIEHE, Tim, 2009. Sequential Torts and Bilateral Harm. In: International Review of Law & Economics. 2009, 29(2), pp. 161-168. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.irle.2008.10.002deu
kops.citation.iso690FRIEHE, Tim, 2009. Sequential Torts and Bilateral Harm. In: International Review of Law & Economics. 2009, 29(2), pp. 161-168. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.irle.2008.10.002eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/1839">
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
    <dc:contributor>Friehe, Tim</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2009</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T09:36:08Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T09:36:08Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: International Review of Law &amp; Economics 29 (2009), 2, pp. 161-168</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Friehe, Tim</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/1839"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper analyzes care incentives of individuals in a bilateral-harm setting if care choices are sequential. We find that the efficient outcome is not guaranteed under any liability rule considered, irrespective of whether information is perfect or imperfect. Furthermore, it is no longer possible to generally rank liability rules according to their induced social costs. These findings are in strong contrast to the sequential-torts setting in which harm is unilateral.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:title>Sequential Torts and Bilateral Harm</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-94383deu
kops.opus.id9438deu
kops.sourcefieldInternational Review of Law & Economics. 2009, <b>29</b>(2), pp. 161-168. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.irle.2008.10.002deu
kops.sourcefield.plainInternational Review of Law & Economics. 2009, 29(2), pp. 161-168. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.irle.2008.10.002deu
kops.sourcefield.plainInternational Review of Law & Economics. 2009, 29(2), pp. 161-168. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.irle.2008.10.002eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6c13a9c4-3893-47fd-bb11-1f149e927894
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6c13a9c4-3893-47fd-bb11-1f149e927894
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage161
source.bibliographicInfo.issue2
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage168
source.bibliographicInfo.volume29
source.periodicalTitleInternational Review of Law & Economics

Dateien