Social desirability in spouse ratings

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2019
Autor:innen
Steingrimsdottir, E.D.
Thorsdottir, Fanney
Joinson, Adam N.
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Psychological Reports. 2019, 122(2), pp. 593-608. ISSN 0033-2941. eISSN 1558-691X. Available under: doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033294118767815
Zusammenfassung

Whether or not socially desirable responding (SDR) is a cause for concern in personality assessment has long been debated. For many researchers, McCrae and Costa (1983) laid the issue to rest when they showed that correcting for SDR in self-reports did not improve the agreement with spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. However, their findings rest on the assumption that observer ratings in general, and spouse ratings in particular, are an unbiased external criterion. If spouse ratings are also susceptible to SDR, correcting for the bias in self-rated measures cannot be assumed to increase agreement between self-reports and spouse ratings, and thus failure to do so should not be taken as evidence for the ineffectiveness of measuring and correcting for SDR. In the present study, McCrae and Costa’s influential study was replicated with the exception of measuring SDR with the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale, in both self-reports and spouse ratings. Analyses were based on responses from 70 couples who had lived together for at least one year. The results showed that both self-reports and spouse ratings are susceptible to SDR and thus McCrae and Costa’s conclusion is drawn into question.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
Socially desirable responding, Psychometrics, Measures & Statistics, personality, response bias, spouse ratings, content overlap
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690VÉSTEINSDÓTTIR, Vaka, E.D. STEINGRIMSDOTTIR, Fanney THORSDOTTIR, Adam N. JOINSON, Ulf-Dietrich REIPS, 2019. Social desirability in spouse ratings. In: Psychological Reports. 2019, 122(2), pp. 593-608. ISSN 0033-2941. eISSN 1558-691X. Available under: doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033294118767815
BibTex
@article{Vesteinsdottir2019Socia-41780,
  year={2019},
  doi={https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033294118767815},
  title={Social desirability in spouse ratings},
  number={2},
  volume={122},
  issn={0033-2941},
  journal={Psychological Reports},
  pages={593--608},
  author={Vésteinsdóttir, Vaka and Steingrimsdottir, E.D. and Thorsdottir, Fanney and Joinson, Adam  N. and Reips, Ulf-Dietrich}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/41780">
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/41780"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:title>Social desirability in spouse ratings</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Thorsdottir, Fanney</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Whether or not socially desirable responding (SDR) is a cause for concern in personality assessment has long been debated. For many researchers, McCrae and Costa (1983) laid the issue to rest when they showed that correcting for SDR in self-reports did not improve the agreement with spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. However, their findings rest on the assumption that observer ratings in general, and spouse ratings in particular, are an unbiased external criterion. If spouse ratings are also susceptible to SDR, correcting for the bias in self-rated measures cannot be assumed to increase agreement between self-reports and spouse ratings, and thus failure to do so should not be taken as evidence for the ineffectiveness of measuring and correcting for SDR. In the present study, McCrae and Costa’s influential study was replicated with the exception of measuring SDR with the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale, in both self-reports and spouse ratings. Analyses were based on responses from 70 couples who had lived together for at least one year. The results showed that both self-reports and spouse ratings are susceptible to SDR and thus McCrae and Costa’s conclusion is drawn into question.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Steingrimsdottir, E.D.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Vésteinsdóttir, Vaka</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-03-14T10:44:42Z</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/41780/1/Vesteinsdottir_2-jhw7gcn2utup4.pdf"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Vésteinsdóttir, Vaka</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Joinson, Adam  N.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Steingrimsdottir, E.D.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-03-14T10:44:42Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Joinson, Adam  N.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Thorsdottir, Fanney</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2019</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/41780/1/Vesteinsdottir_2-jhw7gcn2utup4.pdf"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen

Versionsgeschichte

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
VersionDatumZusammenfassung
1*
2018-03-14 10:44:42
* Ausgewählte Version