Publikation:

AGM, Ranking Theory, and the Many Ways to Cope with Examples

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Spohn_0-282447.pdf
Spohn_0-282447.pdfGröße: 821.21 KBDownloads: 590

Datum

2014

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

SVEN OVE HANSSON, , ed.. David Makinson on Classical Methods for Non-Classical Problems. Dordrecht [u.a.]: Springer, 2014, pp. 95-118. Outstanding contributions to logic. 3. ISBN 978-94-007-7758-3. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7759-0_6

Zusammenfassung

The paper first explains how the ranking-theoretic belief change or conditionalization rules entail all of the standard AGM belief revision and contraction axioms. Those axioms have met a lot of objections and counter-examples, which thus extend to ranking theory as well. The paper argues for a paradigmatic set of cases that the counter-examples can be well accounted for with various pragmatic strategies while maintaining the axioms. So, one point of the paper is to save AGM belief revision theory as well as ranking theory. The other point, however, is to display how complex the pragmatic interaction of belief change and utterance meaning may be; it should be systematically and not only paradigmatically explored.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Verknüpfte Datensätze

Zitieren

ISO 690SPOHN, Wolfgang, 2014. AGM, Ranking Theory, and the Many Ways to Cope with Examples. In: SVEN OVE HANSSON, , ed.. David Makinson on Classical Methods for Non-Classical Problems. Dordrecht [u.a.]: Springer, 2014, pp. 95-118. Outstanding contributions to logic. 3. ISBN 978-94-007-7758-3. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7759-0_6
BibTex
@incollection{Spohn2014Ranki-30324,
  year={2014},
  doi={10.1007/978-94-007-7759-0_6},
  title={AGM, Ranking Theory, and the Many Ways to Cope with Examples},
  number={3},
  isbn={978-94-007-7758-3},
  publisher={Springer},
  address={Dordrecht [u.a.]},
  series={Outstanding contributions to logic},
  booktitle={David Makinson on Classical Methods for Non-Classical Problems},
  pages={95--118},
  editor={Sven Ove Hansson},
  author={Spohn, Wolfgang}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30324">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2014</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/30324"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The paper first explains how the ranking-theoretic belief change or conditionalization rules entail all of the standard AGM belief revision and contraction axioms. Those axioms have met a lot of objections and counter-examples, which thus extend to ranking theory as well. The paper argues for a paradigmatic set of cases that the counter-examples can be well accounted for with various pragmatic strategies while maintaining the axioms. So, one point of the paper is to save AGM belief revision theory as well as ranking theory. The other point, however, is to display how complex the pragmatic interaction of belief change and utterance meaning may be; it should be systematically and not only paradigmatically explored.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30324/1/Spohn_0-282447.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:title>AGM, Ranking Theory, and the Many Ways to Cope with Examples</dcterms:title>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-03-17T07:18:06Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30324/1/Spohn_0-282447.pdf"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-03-17T07:18:06Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen

Versionsgeschichte

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
VersionDatumZusammenfassung
1*
2015-03-17 07:18:06
* Ausgewählte Version