AGM, Ranking Theory, and the Many Ways to Cope with Examples

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Spohn_0-282447.pdf
Spohn_0-282447.pdfGröße: 821.21 KBDownloads: 584
Datum
2014
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
SVEN OVE HANSSON, , ed.. David Makinson on Classical Methods for Non-Classical Problems. Dordrecht [u.a.]: Springer, 2014, pp. 95-118. Outstanding contributions to logic. 3. ISBN 978-94-007-7758-3. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7759-0_6
Zusammenfassung

The paper first explains how the ranking-theoretic belief change or conditionalization rules entail all of the standard AGM belief revision and contraction axioms. Those axioms have met a lot of objections and counter-examples, which thus extend to ranking theory as well. The paper argues for a paradigmatic set of cases that the counter-examples can be well accounted for with various pragmatic strategies while maintaining the axioms. So, one point of the paper is to save AGM belief revision theory as well as ranking theory. The other point, however, is to display how complex the pragmatic interaction of belief change and utterance meaning may be; it should be systematically and not only paradigmatically explored.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Datensätze
Zitieren
ISO 690SPOHN, Wolfgang, 2014. AGM, Ranking Theory, and the Many Ways to Cope with Examples. In: SVEN OVE HANSSON, , ed.. David Makinson on Classical Methods for Non-Classical Problems. Dordrecht [u.a.]: Springer, 2014, pp. 95-118. Outstanding contributions to logic. 3. ISBN 978-94-007-7758-3. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7759-0_6
BibTex
@incollection{Spohn2014Ranki-30324,
  year={2014},
  doi={10.1007/978-94-007-7759-0_6},
  title={AGM, Ranking Theory, and the Many Ways to Cope with Examples},
  number={3},
  isbn={978-94-007-7758-3},
  publisher={Springer},
  address={Dordrecht [u.a.]},
  series={Outstanding contributions to logic},
  booktitle={David Makinson on Classical Methods for Non-Classical Problems},
  pages={95--118},
  editor={Sven Ove Hansson},
  author={Spohn, Wolfgang}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30324">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2014</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/30324"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The paper first explains how the ranking-theoretic belief change or conditionalization rules entail all of the standard AGM belief revision and contraction axioms. Those axioms have met a lot of objections and counter-examples, which thus extend to ranking theory as well. The paper argues for a paradigmatic set of cases that the counter-examples can be well accounted for with various pragmatic strategies while maintaining the axioms. So, one point of the paper is to save AGM belief revision theory as well as ranking theory. The other point, however, is to display how complex the pragmatic interaction of belief change and utterance meaning may be; it should be systematically and not only paradigmatically explored.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30324/1/Spohn_0-282447.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:title>AGM, Ranking Theory, and the Many Ways to Cope with Examples</dcterms:title>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-03-17T07:18:06Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30324/1/Spohn_0-282447.pdf"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-03-17T07:18:06Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen

Versionsgeschichte

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
VersionDatumZusammenfassung
1*
2015-03-17 07:18:06
* Ausgewählte Version