Neo-corporatism and the responsiveness of democracy

Busemeyer, Marius R.

Neo-corporatism and the responsiveness of democracy

Dateien

Busemeyer_2-k4ya43soerj65.pdfGröße: 324.65 KBDownloads: 250

Datum

2020

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Politik- und Verwaltungswissenschaft

Publikationstyp

Beitrag zu einem Sammelband

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

CAREJA, Romana, ed., Patrick EMMENEGGER, ed., Nathalie GIGER, ed.. The European Social Model under Pressure : Liber Amicorum in Honour of Klaus Armingeon. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2020, pp. 15-31. ISBN 978-3-658-27042-1. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_2

Zusammenfassung

In this chapter, I want to discuss the relationship between neo-corporatism as a form of interest group representation and prevailing inequalities in democratic representation and responsiveness. In much of the existing literature on the role of public opinion and democratic policy-making (most of it from the US), interest group influence is portrayed as something that distracts policy-makers from implementing the will of the people, catering to ‘special interests’ instead. In contrast, the core normative foundation of corporatist decision-making is based on the idea that corporatist institutions are superior to interest group pluralism in the sense that corporatism ensures a proper representation of those interests that are difficult to organize and mobilize. In my contribution, I want to provide a critical theoretical discussion of the promises and challenges of corporatist decision-making in relation to the normative goal of ensuring a responsive and representative democracy, drawing on the work of Klaus Armingeon and others.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

320 Politik

Zitieren

ISO 690

BUSEMEYER, Marius R., 2020. Neo-corporatism and the responsiveness of democracy. In: CAREJA, Romana, ed., Patrick EMMENEGGER, ed., Nathalie GIGER, ed.. The European Social Model under Pressure : Liber Amicorum in Honour of Klaus Armingeon. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2020, pp. 15-31. ISBN 978-3-658-27042-1. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_2

BibTex

@incollection{Busemeyer2020Neoco-46715,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_2},
  title={Neo-corporatism and the responsiveness of democracy},
  isbn={978-3-658-27042-1},
  publisher={Springer VS},
  address={Wiesbaden},
  booktitle={The European Social Model under Pressure : Liber Amicorum in Honour of Klaus Armingeon},
  pages={15--31},
  editor={Careja, Romana and Emmenegger, Patrick and Giger, Nathalie},
  author={Busemeyer, Marius R.}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46715">
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/46715"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-08-22T11:56:54Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Busemeyer, Marius R.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Neo-corporatism and the responsiveness of democracy</dcterms:title>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46715/1/Busemeyer_2-k4ya43soerj65.pdf"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46715/1/Busemeyer_2-k4ya43soerj65.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In this chapter, I want to discuss the relationship between neo-corporatism as a form of interest group representation and prevailing inequalities in democratic representation and responsiveness. In much of the existing literature on the role of public opinion and democratic policy-making (most of it from the US), interest group influence is portrayed as something that distracts policy-makers from implementing the will of the people, catering to ‘special interests’ instead. In contrast, the core normative foundation of corporatist decision-making is based on the idea that corporatist institutions are superior to interest group pluralism in the sense that corporatism ensures a proper representation of those interests that are difficult to organize and mobilize. In my contribution, I want to provide a critical theoretical discussion of the promises and challenges of corporatist decision-making in relation to the normative goal of ensuring a responsive and representative democracy, drawing on the work of Klaus Armingeon and others.</dcterms:abstract>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-08-22T11:56:54Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Busemeyer, Marius R.</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja