Rawls különbözeti elve

Tanyi, Attila

Rawls különbözeti elve

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2007

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Rawls’ Difference Principle

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Politikatudományi Szemle. 2007, 16(2), pp. 126-144

Zusammenfassung

This paper deals with the third and most disputed principle of John Rawls’s theory of justice: the so-called difference principle. My reasoning has three parts. I first present and examine the principle. My investigation is driven by three questions: what considerations lead Rawls to the acceptance of the principle; what the principle’s relation to effectiveness is; and what and how much the principle demands. A proper understanding of the principle permits me to spend the second half of the paper with exploring the difficulties the principle encounters. I first discuss four well-known objections and argue that all of them, partly or entirely, hold against the principle. I then discuss the applicability of the principle with special attention to the relations among the three Rawlsian principles and the notion of the social minimum. Investigation of the first issue shows that the two other principles leave enough room for the difference principle, whereas in the second case I conclude that parties to the Rawlsian original position would prefer a social minimum principle to the difference principle. Finally, at the end of the paper, I briefly summarize my reasoning repeating its most important findings.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

100 Philosophie

Zitieren

ISO 690

TANYI, Attila, 2007. Rawls különbözeti elve. In: Politikatudományi Szemle. 2007, 16(2), pp. 126-144

BibTex

@article{Tanyi2007Rawls-17039,
  year={2007},
  title={Rawls különbözeti elve},
  number={2},
  volume={16},
  journal={Politikatudományi Szemle},
  pages={126--144},
  author={Tanyi, Attila}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/17039">
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Tanyi, Attila</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-12-07T09:07:46Z</dcterms:available>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
    <dcterms:title>Rawls különbözeti elve</dcterms:title>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:alternative>Rawls’ Difference Principle</dcterms:alternative>
    <dcterms:issued>2007</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-12-07T09:07:46Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="und">This paper deals with the third and most disputed principle of John Rawls’s theory of justice: the so-called difference principle. My reasoning has three parts. I first present and examine the principle. My investigation is driven by three questions: what considerations lead Rawls to the acceptance of the principle; what the principle’s relation to effectiveness is; and what and how much the principle demands. A proper understanding of the principle permits me to spend the second half of the paper with exploring the difficulties the principle encounters. I first discuss four well-known objections and argue that all of them, partly or entirely, hold against the principle. I then discuss the applicability of the principle with special attention to the relations among the three Rawlsian principles and the notion of the social minimum. Investigation of the first issue shows that the two other principles leave enough room for the difference principle, whereas in the second case I conclude that parties to the Rawlsian original position would prefer a social minimum principle to the difference principle. Finally, at the end of the paper, I briefly summarize my reasoning repeating its most important findings.</dcterms:abstract>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/17039"/>
    <dc:language>hun</dc:language>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: Politikatudományi Szemle  ; 16 (2007), 2. - S. 126-144</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:contributor>Tanyi, Attila</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Nein