## Is human sentence parsing serial or parallel? : Evidence from event-related brain potentials

2003
Hopf, Jens-Max
Meng, Michael
##### Project
Sprachverstehen und variable Wortstellung: Syntaktische und außersyntaktische Faktoren bei der Verarbeitung deutscher Sätze
Journal article
##### Published in
Cognitive Brain Research ; 15 (2003). - pp. 165-177
##### Abstract
In this ERP study we investigate the processes that occur in syntactically ambiguous German sentences at the point of disambiguation. Whereas most psycholinguistic theories agree on the view that processing difficulties arise when parsing preferences are disconfirmed (so-called garden-path effects), important differences exist with respect to theoretical assumptions about the parser s recovery from a misparse. A key distinction can be made between parsers that compute all alternative syntactic structures in parallel (parallel parsers) and parsers that compute only a single preferred analysis (serial parsers). To distinguish empirically between parallel and serial parsing models, we compare ERP responses to garden-path sentences with ERP responses to truly ungrammatical sentences. Garden-path sentences contain a temporary and ultimately curable ungrammaticality, whereas truly ungrammatical sentences remain so permanently a difference which gives rise to different predictions in the two classes of parsing architectures. At the disambiguating word, ERPs in both sentence types show negative shifts of similar onset latency, amplitude, and scalp distribution in an initial time window between 300 and 500 ms. In a following time window (500 700 ms), the negative shift to garden-path sentences disappears at right central parietal sites, while it continues in permanently ungrammatical sentences. These data are taken as evidence for a strictly serial parser. The absence of a difference in the early time window indicates that temporary and permanent ungrammaticalities trigger the same kind of parsing responses. Later differences can be related to successful reanalysis in garden-path but not in ungrammatical sentences.
##### Subject (DDC)
400 Philology, Linguistics
##### Keywords
ERP,Sentence-processing,Syntactic reanalysis,N400,LAN
##### Cite This
ISO 690HOPF, Jens-Max, Markus BADER, Michael MENG, Josef BAYER, 2003. Is human sentence parsing serial or parallel? : Evidence from event-related brain potentials. In: Cognitive Brain Research. 15, pp. 165-177. Available under: doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00149-0
BibTex
@article{Hopf2003human-3691,
year={2003},
doi={10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00149-0},
title={Is human sentence parsing serial or parallel? : Evidence from event-related brain potentials},
volume={15},
journal={Cognitive Brain Research},
pages={165--177},
author={Hopf, Jens-Max and Bader, Markus and Meng, Michael and Bayer, Josef}
}

RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Cognitive Brain Research 15 (2003), pp. 165 177</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3691/1/Is_human_sentence_parsing_serial_or_parallel.pdf"/>
<dcterms:title>Is human sentence parsing serial or parallel? : Evidence from event-related brain potentials</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:issued>2003</dcterms:issued>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Bayer, Josef</dc:creator>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3691/1/Is_human_sentence_parsing_serial_or_parallel.pdf"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In this ERP study we investigate the processes that occur in syntactically ambiguous German sentences at the point of disambiguation. Whereas most psycholinguistic theories agree on the view that processing difficulties arise when parsing preferences are disconfirmed (so-called garden-path effects), important differences exist with respect to theoretical assumptions about the parser s recovery from a misparse. A key distinction can be made between parsers that compute all alternative syntactic structures in parallel (parallel parsers) and parsers that compute only a single preferred analysis (serial parsers). To distinguish empirically between parallel and serial parsing models, we compare ERP responses to garden-path sentences with ERP responses to truly ungrammatical sentences. Garden-path sentences contain a temporary and ultimately curable ungrammaticality, whereas truly ungrammatical sentences remain so permanently  a difference which gives rise to different predictions in the two classes of parsing architectures. At the disambiguating word, ERPs in both sentence types show negative shifts of similar onset latency, amplitude, and scalp distribution in an initial time window between 300 and 500 ms. In a following time window (500 700 ms), the negative shift to garden-path sentences disappears at right central parietal sites, while it continues in permanently ungrammatical sentences. These data are taken as evidence for a strictly serial parser. The absence of a difference in the early time window indicates that temporary and permanent ungrammaticalities trigger the same kind of parsing responses. Later differences can be related to successful reanalysis in garden-path but not in ungrammatical sentences.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:creator>Meng, Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/3691"/>
<dc:contributor>Bayer, Josef</dc:contributor>