Are ideological and partisan affinities determining voters’ support of arms deliveries? : Insights from a large-scale survey experiment in France and Germany
| dc.contributor.author | Rudolph, Lukas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Thurner, Paul W. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-08T07:18:59Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-11-08T07:18:59Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-02 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine raised for many parties the question of how to position themselves in view of urgently requested arms deliveries. Since, the topic of arms trade, which has hitherto rarely been addressed, has become a heavily politicized and divisive issue and partly even polarized public opinion. A major prerequisite for parties’ position-taking is to anticipate how voters react to such arms transfers and, more specifically, whether their respective attitudes are structured along the predominant left-right axis. Based on a large-scale survey experiment with French and German voters (N = 6617) in the year before the Russian invasion, we are able to focus on the relationship between ideological predispositions, vote intentions, and issue attitudes in a non-politicized period. Using both vignette and conjoint experiments, we demonstrate that voters’ attitudes on military transfers can be subsumed remarkably well under the left-right scale. Differentiating the impact of normative and economic considerations, the former is stronger among the left, while the latter also affects the attitudes of rightist citizens. However, normative considerations are the most important concern along the whole political spectrum. The turn of the German Green Party in 2022 to assist countries that are being aggressively attacked (because of the Responsibility to Protect), was not reflected in our data. | |
| dc.description.version | published | deu |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/s1755773924000109 | |
| dc.identifier.ppn | 1919724648 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/71156 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Weapons exports | |
| dc.subject | foreign policy | |
| dc.subject | public opinion | |
| dc.subject | left-right | |
| dc.subject | party politics | |
| dc.subject | cross-national comparison | |
| dc.subject.ddc | 320 | |
| dc.title | Are ideological and partisan affinities determining voters’ support of arms deliveries? : Insights from a large-scale survey experiment in France and Germany | eng |
| dc.type | JOURNAL_ARTICLE | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| kops.citation.bibtex | @article{Rudolph2025-02ideol-71156,
title={Are ideological and partisan affinities determining voters’ support of arms deliveries? : Insights from a large-scale survey experiment in France and Germany},
year={2025},
doi={10.1017/s1755773924000109},
number={1},
volume={17},
issn={1755-7739},
journal={European Political Science Review},
pages={1--21},
author={Rudolph, Lukas and Thurner, Paul W.}
} | |
| kops.citation.iso690 | RUDOLPH, Lukas, Paul W. THURNER, 2025. Are ideological and partisan affinities determining voters’ support of arms deliveries? : Insights from a large-scale survey experiment in France and Germany. In: European Political Science Review. Cambridge University Press (CUP). 2025, 17(1), S. 1-21. ISSN 1755-7739. eISSN 1755-7747. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1017/s1755773924000109 | deu |
| kops.citation.iso690 | RUDOLPH, Lukas, Paul W. THURNER, 2025. Are ideological and partisan affinities determining voters’ support of arms deliveries? : Insights from a large-scale survey experiment in France and Germany. In: European Political Science Review. Cambridge University Press (CUP). 2025, 17(1), pp. 1-21. ISSN 1755-7739. eISSN 1755-7747. Available under: doi: 10.1017/s1755773924000109 | eng |
| kops.citation.rdf | <rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71156">
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Rudolph, Lukas</dc:creator>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/71156/1/Rudolph_2-lvvj56v6hjah0.pdf"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-11-08T07:18:59Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:abstract>The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine raised for many parties the question of how to position themselves in view of urgently requested arms deliveries. Since, the topic of arms trade, which has hitherto rarely been addressed, has become a heavily politicized and divisive issue and partly even polarized public opinion. A major prerequisite for parties’ position-taking is to anticipate how voters react to such arms transfers and, more specifically, whether their respective attitudes are structured along the predominant left-right axis. Based on a large-scale survey experiment with French and German voters (N = 6617) in the year before the Russian invasion, we are able to focus on the relationship between ideological predispositions, vote intentions, and issue attitudes in a non-politicized period. Using both vignette and conjoint experiments, we demonstrate that voters’ attitudes on military transfers can be subsumed remarkably well under the left-right scale. Differentiating the impact of normative and economic considerations, the former is stronger among the left, while the latter also affects the attitudes of rightist citizens. However, normative considerations are the most important concern along the whole political spectrum. The turn of the German Green Party in 2022 to assist countries that are being aggressively attacked (because of the Responsibility to Protect), was not reflected in our data.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:contributor>Rudolph, Lukas</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Thurner, Paul W.</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Thurner, Paul W.</dc:creator>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-11-08T07:18:59Z</dc:date>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:title>Are ideological and partisan affinities determining voters’ support of arms deliveries? : Insights from a large-scale survey experiment in France and Germany</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/71156/1/Rudolph_2-lvvj56v6hjah0.pdf"/>
<dcterms:issued>2025-02</dcterms:issued>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/71156"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> | |
| kops.description.openAccess | openaccesshybrid | |
| kops.flag.isPeerReviewed | true | |
| kops.flag.knbibliography | true | |
| kops.identifier.nbn | urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-lvvj56v6hjah0 | |
| kops.sourcefield | European Political Science Review. Cambridge University Press (CUP). 2025, <b>17</b>(1), S. 1-21. ISSN 1755-7739. eISSN 1755-7747. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1017/s1755773924000109 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | European Political Science Review. Cambridge University Press (CUP). 2025, 17(1), S. 1-21. ISSN 1755-7739. eISSN 1755-7747. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1017/s1755773924000109 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | European Political Science Review. Cambridge University Press (CUP). 2025, 17(1), pp. 1-21. ISSN 1755-7739. eISSN 1755-7747. Available under: doi: 10.1017/s1755773924000109 | eng |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | b81850ca-2661-4f65-ac3a-98ce15d296b9 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | b81850ca-2661-4f65-ac3a-98ce15d296b9 | |
| relation.isDatasetOfPublication | 0a41a398-a010-418c-b51f-09b4e53136e3 | |
| relation.isDatasetOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 0a41a398-a010-418c-b51f-09b4e53136e3 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage | 1 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.issue | 1 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.toPage | 21 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.volume | 17 | |
| source.identifier.eissn | 1755-7747 | |
| source.identifier.issn | 1755-7739 | |
| source.periodicalTitle | European Political Science Review | |
| source.publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
Dateien
Originalbündel
1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
- Name:
- Rudolph_2-lvvj56v6hjah0.pdf
- Größe:
- 440.13 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
