Are ideological and partisan affinities determining voters’ support of arms deliveries? : Insights from a large-scale survey experiment in France and Germany

dc.contributor.authorRudolph, Lukas
dc.contributor.authorThurner, Paul W.
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-08T07:18:59Z
dc.date.available2024-11-08T07:18:59Z
dc.date.issued2025-02
dc.description.abstractThe 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine raised for many parties the question of how to position themselves in view of urgently requested arms deliveries. Since, the topic of arms trade, which has hitherto rarely been addressed, has become a heavily politicized and divisive issue and partly even polarized public opinion. A major prerequisite for parties’ position-taking is to anticipate how voters react to such arms transfers and, more specifically, whether their respective attitudes are structured along the predominant left-right axis. Based on a large-scale survey experiment with French and German voters (N = 6617) in the year before the Russian invasion, we are able to focus on the relationship between ideological predispositions, vote intentions, and issue attitudes in a non-politicized period. Using both vignette and conjoint experiments, we demonstrate that voters’ attitudes on military transfers can be subsumed remarkably well under the left-right scale. Differentiating the impact of normative and economic considerations, the former is stronger among the left, while the latter also affects the attitudes of rightist citizens. However, normative considerations are the most important concern along the whole political spectrum. The turn of the German Green Party in 2022 to assist countries that are being aggressively attacked (because of the Responsibility to Protect), was not reflected in our data.
dc.description.versionpublisheddeu
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/s1755773924000109
dc.identifier.ppn1919724648
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/71156
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectWeapons exports
dc.subjectforeign policy
dc.subjectpublic opinion
dc.subjectleft-right
dc.subjectparty politics
dc.subjectcross-national comparison
dc.subject.ddc320
dc.titleAre ideological and partisan affinities determining voters’ support of arms deliveries? : Insights from a large-scale survey experiment in France and Germanyeng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLE
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Rudolph2025-02ideol-71156,
  title={Are ideological and partisan affinities determining voters’ support of arms deliveries? : Insights from a large-scale survey experiment in France and Germany},
  year={2025},
  doi={10.1017/s1755773924000109},
  number={1},
  volume={17},
  issn={1755-7739},
  journal={European Political Science Review},
  pages={1--21},
  author={Rudolph, Lukas and Thurner, Paul W.}
}
kops.citation.iso690RUDOLPH, Lukas, Paul W. THURNER, 2025. Are ideological and partisan affinities determining voters’ support of arms deliveries? : Insights from a large-scale survey experiment in France and Germany. In: European Political Science Review. Cambridge University Press (CUP). 2025, 17(1), S. 1-21. ISSN 1755-7739. eISSN 1755-7747. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1017/s1755773924000109deu
kops.citation.iso690RUDOLPH, Lukas, Paul W. THURNER, 2025. Are ideological and partisan affinities determining voters’ support of arms deliveries? : Insights from a large-scale survey experiment in France and Germany. In: European Political Science Review. Cambridge University Press (CUP). 2025, 17(1), pp. 1-21. ISSN 1755-7739. eISSN 1755-7747. Available under: doi: 10.1017/s1755773924000109eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71156">
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Rudolph, Lukas</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/71156/1/Rudolph_2-lvvj56v6hjah0.pdf"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-11-08T07:18:59Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:abstract>The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine raised for many parties the question of how to position themselves in view of urgently requested arms deliveries. Since, the topic of arms trade, which has hitherto rarely been addressed, has become a heavily politicized and divisive issue and partly even polarized public opinion. A major prerequisite for parties’ position-taking is to anticipate how voters react to such arms transfers and, more specifically, whether their respective attitudes are structured along the predominant left-right axis. Based on a large-scale survey experiment with French and German voters (N = 6617) in the year before the Russian invasion, we are able to focus on the relationship between ideological predispositions, vote intentions, and issue attitudes in a non-politicized period. Using both vignette and conjoint experiments, we demonstrate that voters’ attitudes on military transfers can be subsumed remarkably well under the left-right scale. Differentiating the impact of normative and economic considerations, the former is stronger among the left, while the latter also affects the attitudes of rightist citizens. However, normative considerations are the most important concern along the whole political spectrum. The turn of the German Green Party in 2022 to assist countries that are being aggressively attacked (because of the Responsibility to Protect), was not reflected in our data.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Rudolph, Lukas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Thurner, Paul W.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Thurner, Paul W.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-11-08T07:18:59Z</dc:date>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:title>Are ideological and partisan affinities determining voters’ support of arms deliveries? : Insights from a large-scale survey experiment in France and Germany</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/71156/1/Rudolph_2-lvvj56v6hjah0.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2025-02</dcterms:issued>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/71156"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccesshybrid
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrue
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-lvvj56v6hjah0
kops.sourcefieldEuropean Political Science Review. Cambridge University Press (CUP). 2025, <b>17</b>(1), S. 1-21. ISSN 1755-7739. eISSN 1755-7747. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1017/s1755773924000109deu
kops.sourcefield.plainEuropean Political Science Review. Cambridge University Press (CUP). 2025, 17(1), S. 1-21. ISSN 1755-7739. eISSN 1755-7747. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1017/s1755773924000109deu
kops.sourcefield.plainEuropean Political Science Review. Cambridge University Press (CUP). 2025, 17(1), pp. 1-21. ISSN 1755-7739. eISSN 1755-7747. Available under: doi: 10.1017/s1755773924000109eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb81850ca-2661-4f65-ac3a-98ce15d296b9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb81850ca-2661-4f65-ac3a-98ce15d296b9
relation.isDatasetOfPublication0a41a398-a010-418c-b51f-09b4e53136e3
relation.isDatasetOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0a41a398-a010-418c-b51f-09b4e53136e3
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage1
source.bibliographicInfo.issue1
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage21
source.bibliographicInfo.volume17
source.identifier.eissn1755-7747
source.identifier.issn1755-7739
source.periodicalTitleEuropean Political Science Review
source.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Rudolph_2-lvvj56v6hjah0.pdf
Größe:
440.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Rudolph_2-lvvj56v6hjah0.pdf
Rudolph_2-lvvj56v6hjah0.pdfGröße: 440.13 KBDownloads: 171