Publikation: An Essay on the Desire-Based Reasons Model
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2006
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Monographie
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
The dissertation argues against the idea that reasons for action are provided by human desires (I call this the Model). After spelling out three versions of the Model, I go on to attack it from three angles. I first argue that the most plausible meta-ethical background for the Model is ethical naturalism, but that the naturalist Model cannot vindicate the reduction it proposes and this is unacceptable. After this, I present and defend an approach that questions the idea that the reason-relation must make reference to human desires. The alternative approach argues that desires only transmit reasons on which they are themselves based. Finally, I argue that the right theory of motivation is cognitivist and not Humean in character.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
TANYI, Attila, 2006. An Essay on the Desire-Based Reasons ModelBibTex
@book{Tanyi2006Essay-17045,
year={2006},
title={An Essay on the Desire-Based Reasons Model},
author={Tanyi, Attila},
note={Zugl.: Budapest, Univ., Diss., 2006}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/17045">
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-12-07T09:53:23Z</dcterms:available>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/17045/2/thesis_tanyi.pdf"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/17045"/>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/17045/2/thesis_tanyi.pdf"/>
<dcterms:issued>2006</dcterms:issued>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:creator>Tanyi, Attila</dc:creator>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dc:contributor>Tanyi, Attila</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:title>An Essay on the Desire-Based Reasons Model</dcterms:title>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The dissertation argues against the idea that reasons for action are provided by human desires (I call this the Model). After spelling out three versions of the Model, I go on to attack it from three angles. I first argue that the most plausible meta-ethical background for the Model is ethical naturalism, but that the naturalist Model cannot vindicate the reduction it proposes and this is unacceptable. After this, I present and defend an approach that questions the idea that the reason-relation must make reference to human desires. The alternative approach argues that desires only transmit reasons on which they are themselves based. Finally, I argue that the right theory of motivation is cognitivist and not Humean in character.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-12-07T09:53:23Z</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
December 14, 2006
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Zugl.: Budapest, Univ., Diss., 2006
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
