Publikation: Partisanship and Place : Education Preferences Across the Urban–Rural Divide
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Research linking political polarization to spatial divides has largely overlooked policy preferences. This article argues that local conditions meaningfully moderate the relationship between party affiliation and people’s policy preferences. Focusing on public education in the United States, it contends that local realities can create contextual cross-pressures for partisans, especially Republicans, whose education needs may be at odds with the party agenda. In rural contexts, alternative schooling is limited and traditional public schools are essential institutions. Preferences should reflect these contextual pressures. Examining survey data for tax and spending preferences, findings suggest that while Republicans generally oppose increased education funding, rural Republicans, particularly in areas with limited school choice, are more supportive of public education taxes and spending than their urban counterparts. Shedding new light on party-voter congruence, the article shows how local policy realities reshape partisan divides, particularly in rural America, where partisan loyalty persists but policy alignment is more complex.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BERRIOCHOA, Kattalina, 2025. Partisanship and Place : Education Preferences Across the Urban–Rural Divide. In: Political Studies. Sage. ISSN 0032-3217. eISSN 1467-9248. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1177/00323217251382020BibTex
@article{Berriochoa2025-10-28Parti-75169,
title={Partisanship and Place : Education Preferences Across the Urban–Rural Divide},
year={2025},
doi={10.1177/00323217251382020},
issn={0032-3217},
journal={Political Studies},
author={Berriochoa, Kattalina}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/75169">
<dc:contributor>Berriochoa, Kattalina</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-11-11T08:33:14Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International</dc:rights>
<dc:creator>Berriochoa, Kattalina</dc:creator>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-11-11T08:33:14Z</dc:date>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:title>Partisanship and Place : Education Preferences Across the Urban–Rural Divide</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/>
<dcterms:issued>2025-10-28</dcterms:issued>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/75169"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/>
<dcterms:abstract>Research linking political polarization to spatial divides has largely overlooked policy preferences. This article argues that local conditions meaningfully moderate the relationship between party affiliation and people’s policy preferences. Focusing on public education in the United States, it contends that local realities can create contextual cross-pressures for partisans, especially Republicans, whose education needs may be at odds with the party agenda. In rural contexts, alternative schooling is limited and traditional public schools are essential institutions. Preferences should reflect these contextual pressures. Examining survey data for tax and spending preferences, findings suggest that while Republicans generally oppose increased education funding, rural Republicans, particularly in areas with limited school choice, are more supportive of public education taxes and spending than their urban counterparts. Shedding new light on party-voter congruence, the article shows how local policy realities reshape partisan divides, particularly in rural America, where partisan loyalty persists but policy alignment is more complex.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>