Refusing the 'Foolish Wisdom of Resignation' : Kaupapa Māori in conversation with Adorno

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Kirloskar-Steinbach_2-mutkij78g66p8.pdf
Kirloskar-Steinbach_2-mutkij78g66p8.pdfGröße: 241.7 KBDownloads: 220
Datum
2020
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
EU-Projektnummer
DFG-Projektnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung (Freitext)
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
European Journal of Social Theory. Sage Publications. 2020, 23(4), pp. 532-549. ISSN 1368-4310. eISSN 1461-7137. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1368431019872140
Zusammenfassung

Drawing on select works of Adorno, we will first rehearse his reasons for a rejuvenation of philosophy and apply them to philosophers working on world philosophical traditions. We will then analyse Adorno’s arguments pertaining to the theory–praxis relation to ascertain whether his thought could accommodate a study of world philosophical traditions for the simple reason that they are present in a particular society. Shifting our focus slightly, we reflect upon how current ways of professional philosophizing affect the study of world philosophical traditions. As the example of Māori philosophy demonstrates, current philosophical practices seem to delimit the search for the unconventional in academic philosophy. Through its philosophical appropriation, the so-called unconventional tends to mimic conventional patterns in academic philosophy. We will then attempt to find reasons to critique this process within the Adornoian framework itself. The conclusion draws together different strands of the discussion and delineates some paths to take forward the world philosophies project in an Adornoian spirit.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Academic philosophy, Adorno, conceptual decolonization, Māori philosophy, non-conceptual, world philosophies
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690KIRLOSKAR-STEINBACH, Monika, Carl MIKA, 2020. Refusing the 'Foolish Wisdom of Resignation' : Kaupapa Māori in conversation with Adorno. In: European Journal of Social Theory. Sage Publications. 2020, 23(4), pp. 532-549. ISSN 1368-4310. eISSN 1461-7137. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1368431019872140
BibTex
@article{KirloskarSteinbach2020-11Refus-47085,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1177/1368431019872140},
  title={Refusing the 'Foolish Wisdom of Resignation' : Kaupapa Māori in conversation with Adorno},
  number={4},
  volume={23},
  issn={1368-4310},
  journal={European Journal of Social Theory},
  pages={532--549},
  author={Kirloskar-Steinbach, Monika and Mika, Carl}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/47085">
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-09-30T11:39:03Z</dcterms:available>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/47085"/>
    <dcterms:title>Refusing the 'Foolish Wisdom of Resignation' : Kaupapa Māori in conversation with Adorno</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Kirloskar-Steinbach, Monika</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/47085/1/Kirloskar-Steinbach_2-mutkij78g66p8.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Mika, Carl</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-09-30T11:39:03Z</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Mika, Carl</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Kirloskar-Steinbach, Monika</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/47085/1/Kirloskar-Steinbach_2-mutkij78g66p8.pdf"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Drawing on select works of Adorno, we will first rehearse his reasons for a rejuvenation of philosophy and apply them to philosophers working on world philosophical traditions. We will then analyse Adorno’s arguments pertaining to the theory–praxis relation to ascertain whether his thought could accommodate a study of world philosophical traditions for the simple reason that they are present in a particular society. Shifting our focus slightly, we reflect upon how current ways of professional philosophizing affect the study of world philosophical traditions. As the example of Māori philosophy demonstrates, current philosophical practices seem to delimit the search for the unconventional in academic philosophy. Through its philosophical appropriation, the so-called unconventional tends to mimic conventional patterns in academic philosophy. We will then attempt to find reasons to critique this process within the Adornoian framework itself. The conclusion draws together different strands of the discussion and delineates some paths to take forward the world philosophies project in an Adornoian spirit.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:issued>2020-11</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen