Publikation:

Decision making : Nonrational theories

Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2015

Autor:innen

Gigerenzer, Gerd

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26017-0
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Sammlungen

Psychologie: Publikationen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

WRIGHT, James D., ed.. International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences ; vol. 5. 2. ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015, pp. 911-916. ISBN 978-0-08-097086-8. Available under: doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26017-0

Zusammenfassung

In a world of known risks, rational theories provide the norms for successful behavior. In a world where not all risks are known and where optimization is not feasible, ‘nonrational’ tools such as heuristics are needed. In comparison to optimi- zation models, heuristics are robust and can lead to more accurate predictions, while saving time and effort. The study of heuristics addresses the descriptive question of what heuristics an individual or institution has in their ‘adaptive toolbox,’ as well as the normative question of their ecological rationality, i.e., which heuristics in which situations are most accurate and effective.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

Adaptive toolbox; Bias–variance dilemma; Bounded rationality; Decision-making; Heuristics; Optimization; Risk; Uncertainty

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690GIGERENZER, Gerd, Wolfgang GAISSMAIER, 2015. Decision making : Nonrational theories. In: WRIGHT, James D., ed.. International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences ; vol. 5. 2. ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015, pp. 911-916. ISBN 978-0-08-097086-8. Available under: doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26017-0
BibTex
@incollection{Gigerenzer2015Decis-31725,
  year={2015},
  doi={10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26017-0},
  title={Decision making : Nonrational theories},
  edition={2. ed},
  isbn={978-0-08-097086-8},
  publisher={Elsevier},
  address={Amsterdam},
  booktitle={International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences ; vol. 5},
  pages={911--916},
  editor={Wright, James D.},
  author={Gigerenzer, Gerd and Gaissmaier, Wolfgang}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31725">
    <dc:creator>Gigerenzer, Gerd</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:title>Decision making : Nonrational theories</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Gaissmaier, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-09-10T15:03:41Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Gaissmaier, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In a world of known risks, rational theories provide the norms for successful behavior. In a world where not all risks are known and where optimization is not feasible, ‘nonrational’ tools such as heuristics are needed. In comparison to optimi- zation models, heuristics are robust and can lead to more accurate predictions, while saving time and effort. The study of heuristics addresses the descriptive question of what heuristics an individual or institution has in their ‘adaptive toolbox,’ as well as the normative question of their ecological rationality, i.e., which heuristics in which situations are most accurate and effective.</dcterms:abstract>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/31725"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-09-10T15:03:41Z</dcterms:available>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Gigerenzer, Gerd</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen