Publikation:

Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) : Approaches, Challenges, and Tools

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Thomann_2-phj46f1i389f2.pdf
Thomann_2-phj46f1i389f2.pdfGröße: 308.23 KBDownloads: 2632

Datum

2020

Autor:innen

Maggetti, Martino

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Sociological Methods & Research. Sage Publications. 2020, 49(2), pp. 356-386. ISSN 0049-1241. eISSN 1552-8294. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0049124117729700

Zusammenfassung

Recent years have witnessed a host of innovations for conducting research with qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Concurrently, important issues surrounding its uses have been highlighted. In this article, we seek to help users design QCA studies. We argue that establishing inference with QCA involves three intertwined design components: first, clarifying the question of external validity; second, ensuring internal validity; and third, explicitly adopting a specific mode of reasoning. We identify several emerging approaches to QCA rather than just one. Some approaches emphasize case knowledge, while others are condition oriented. Approaches emphasize either substantively interpretable or redundancy-free explanations, and some designs apply an inductive/explorative mode of reasoning, while others integrate deductive elements. Based on extant literature, we discuss issues surrounding inference with QCA and the tools available under different approaches to address these issues. We specify trade-offs and the importance of doing justice to the nature and goals of QCA in a specific research context.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

inference, qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), research design, set-theoretic methods, validity

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Verknüpfte Datensätze

Zitieren

ISO 690THOMANN, Eva, Martino MAGGETTI, 2020. Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) : Approaches, Challenges, and Tools. In: Sociological Methods & Research. Sage Publications. 2020, 49(2), pp. 356-386. ISSN 0049-1241. eISSN 1552-8294. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0049124117729700
BibTex
@article{Thomann2020Desig-52364,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1177/0049124117729700},
  title={Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) : Approaches, Challenges, and Tools},
  number={2},
  volume={49},
  issn={0049-1241},
  journal={Sociological Methods & Research},
  pages={356--386},
  author={Thomann, Eva and Maggetti, Martino}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52364">
    <dcterms:title>Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) : Approaches, Challenges, and Tools</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-01-12T14:09:14Z</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-01-12T14:09:14Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Maggetti, Martino</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52364/1/Thomann_2-phj46f1i389f2.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Thomann, Eva</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Thomann, Eva</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52364/1/Thomann_2-phj46f1i389f2.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/52364"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Recent years have witnessed a host of innovations for conducting research with qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Concurrently, important issues surrounding its uses have been highlighted. In this article, we seek to help users design QCA studies. We argue that establishing inference with QCA involves three intertwined design components: first, clarifying the question of external validity; second, ensuring internal validity; and third, explicitly adopting a specific mode of reasoning. We identify several emerging approaches to QCA rather than just one. Some approaches emphasize case knowledge, while others are condition oriented. Approaches emphasize either substantively interpretable or redundancy-free explanations, and some designs apply an inductive/explorative mode of reasoning, while others integrate deductive elements. Based on extant literature, we discuss issues surrounding inference with QCA and the tools available under different approaches to address these issues. We specify trade-offs and the importance of doing justice to the nature and goals of QCA in a specific research context.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Maggetti, Martino</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen