Toward a Better Understanding of the Mindsets of Negotiators : Development and Construct Validation of the Scale for the Integrative Mindset (SIM)

Ade, Valentin; Dantlgraber, Michael; Schuster, Carolin; Trötschel, Roman

Toward a Better Understanding of the Mindsets of Negotiators : Development and Construct Validation of the Scale for the Integrative Mindset (SIM)

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2020

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Hogrefe & Huber. 2020, 36(5), pp. 740-747. ISSN 1015-5759. eISSN 2151-2426. Available under: doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000548

Zusammenfassung

This article introduces and discusses the 15-item Scale for the Integrative Mindset (SIM) of negotiators, that is of people involved in joint decision-making processes. The scale is based on the integrative mindset (Ade, Schuster, Harinck, & Trötschel, 2018), which describes a set of three inclinations of parties approaching negotiations: a collaborative, a curious, and a creative one. Using a first sample (N = 1,030) of online survey participants, we provide evidence for a high psychometric quality of the SIM as suggested by high reliabilities and good fit indices. We also compare the SIM with scales that measure well-known and possibly related psychological constructs and show the SIM’s distinction to them. Using a second sample (N = 417), we show how the SIM differs from a Scale on Inappropriate Negotiation Strategies (SINS) that has been used in previous negotiation research. The findings of the present studies are discussed with respect to potential applications of the SIM in experimental research.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

negotiation, integrative mindset, scale development, construct validation

Zitieren

ISO 690

ADE, Valentin, Michael DANTLGRABER, Carolin SCHUSTER, Roman TRÖTSCHEL, 2020. Toward a Better Understanding of the Mindsets of Negotiators : Development and Construct Validation of the Scale for the Integrative Mindset (SIM). In: European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Hogrefe & Huber. 2020, 36(5), pp. 740-747. ISSN 1015-5759. eISSN 2151-2426. Available under: doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000548

BibTex

@article{Ade2020Towar-52378,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1027/1015-5759/a000548},
  title={Toward a Better Understanding of the Mindsets of Negotiators : Development and Construct Validation of the Scale for the Integrative Mindset (SIM)},
  number={5},
  volume={36},
  issn={1015-5759},
  journal={European Journal of Psychological Assessment},
  pages={740--747},
  author={Ade, Valentin and Dantlgraber, Michael and Schuster, Carolin and Trötschel, Roman}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52378">
    <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-01-13T11:00:01Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This article introduces and discusses the 15-item Scale for the Integrative Mindset (SIM) of negotiators, that is of people involved in joint decision-making processes. The scale is based on the integrative mindset (Ade, Schuster, Harinck, &amp; Trötschel, 2018), which describes a set of three inclinations of parties approaching negotiations: a collaborative, a curious, and a creative one. Using a first sample (N = 1,030) of online survey participants, we provide evidence for a high psychometric quality of the SIM as suggested by high reliabilities and good fit indices. We also compare the SIM with scales that measure well-known and possibly related psychological constructs and show the SIM’s distinction to them. Using a second sample (N = 417), we show how the SIM differs from a Scale on Inappropriate Negotiation Strategies (SINS) that has been used in previous negotiation research. The findings of the present studies are discussed with respect to potential applications of the SIM in experimental research.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Trötschel, Roman</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Schuster, Carolin</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-01-13T11:00:01Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:title>Toward a Better Understanding of the Mindsets of Negotiators : Development and Construct Validation of the Scale for the Integrative Mindset (SIM)</dcterms:title>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Dantlgraber, Michael</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Ade, Valentin</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Trötschel, Roman</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Ade, Valentin</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/52378"/>
    <dc:creator>Dantlgraber, Michael</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Schuster, Carolin</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja

Begutachtet

Ja