Publikation:

Risk Perceptions After Receiving Multiple Risk Feedback

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Gamp_2-qcf2ojm75nug5.pdf
Gamp_2-qcf2ojm75nug5.pdfGröße: 248.29 KBDownloads: 541

Datum

2018

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Personality & social psychology bulletin. 2018, 44(9), pp. 1350-1363. ISSN 0146-1672. eISSN 1552-7433. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0146167218767877

Zusammenfassung

How do people respond to multiple risk feedback in a real-life context? Based on theoretical assumptions, three different predictions for risk perceptions were tested: (a) relative accuracy in risk perceptions, (b) self-defensive responses according to self-affirmation theory, and (c) compensatory responses according to the compensatory health belief model. Participants of a community health screening ( N = 725) received multiple risk indicator feedback for actual blood pressure, blood glucose, and blood lipid levels. Consistent multiple risk feedback profiles encompassed three consistent readings (three normal or three elevated readings). Mixed risk profiles included one elevated and two normal readings. Results indicate relative accuracy in responses: an elevated reading triggered higher risk perception of the respective risk factor. Importantly, the effect was not modulated by the presence of normal readings as assumed by the self-defensive or compensatory response perspective, indicating that people accurately integrate multiple risk indicator feedback as it is often provided in real life.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

risk perception, communication, multiple risk feedback, defensiveness

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690GAMP, Martina, Harald T. SCHUPP, Britta RENNER, 2018. Risk Perceptions After Receiving Multiple Risk Feedback. In: Personality & social psychology bulletin. 2018, 44(9), pp. 1350-1363. ISSN 0146-1672. eISSN 1552-7433. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0146167218767877
BibTex
@article{Gamp2018-09Perce-43098,
  year={2018},
  doi={10.1177/0146167218767877},
  title={Risk Perceptions After Receiving Multiple Risk Feedback},
  number={9},
  volume={44},
  issn={0146-1672},
  journal={Personality & social psychology bulletin},
  pages={1350--1363},
  author={Gamp, Martina and Schupp, Harald T. and Renner, Britta}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43098">
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/43098"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">How do people respond to multiple risk feedback in a real-life context? Based on theoretical assumptions, three different predictions for risk perceptions were tested: (a) relative accuracy in risk perceptions, (b) self-defensive responses according to self-affirmation theory, and (c) compensatory responses according to the compensatory health belief model. Participants of a community health screening ( N = 725) received multiple risk indicator feedback for actual blood pressure, blood glucose, and blood lipid levels. Consistent multiple risk feedback profiles encompassed three consistent readings (three normal or three elevated readings). Mixed risk profiles included one elevated and two normal readings. Results indicate relative accuracy in responses: an elevated reading triggered higher risk perception of the respective risk factor. Importantly, the effect was not modulated by the presence of normal readings as assumed by the self-defensive or compensatory response perspective, indicating that people accurately integrate multiple risk indicator feedback as it is often provided in real life.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Gamp, Martina</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Schupp, Harald T.</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-08-16T09:52:36Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:title>Risk Perceptions After Receiving Multiple Risk Feedback</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Renner, Britta</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2018-09</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-08-16T09:52:36Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Renner, Britta</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/43098/1/Gamp_2-qcf2ojm75nug5.pdf"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/43098/1/Gamp_2-qcf2ojm75nug5.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Gamp, Martina</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Schupp, Harald T.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen