Sliders for the Smart : Type of Rating Scale on the Web Interacts With Educational Level
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Slider scales and radio buttons scales were experimentally compared in horizontal and vertical orientation. Slider scales lead to statistically significantly higher break-off rates (odds ratio = 6.9) and substantially higher response times. Problems with slider scales were especially prevalent in participants with less than average education, suggesting the slider scale format is more challenging in terms of previous knowledge needed or cognitive load. An alternative explanation, technology-dependent sampling (Buchanan & Reips, 2001), cannot fully account for the current results. The authors clearly advise against the use of Java-based slider scales and advocate low-tech solutions for the design of Web-based data collection. Orientation on screen had no observable effect on data quality or usability of rating scales. Implications of item format for Web-based surveys are discussed.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
FUNKE, Frederik, Ulf-Dietrich REIPS, Randall K. THOMAS, 2010. Sliders for the Smart : Type of Rating Scale on the Web Interacts With Educational Level. In: Social Science Computer Review. 2010, 29(2), pp. 221-231. ISSN 0894-4393. eISSN 1552-8286. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0894439310376896BibTex
@article{Funke2010Slide-28667, year={2010}, doi={10.1177/0894439310376896}, title={Sliders for the Smart : Type of Rating Scale on the Web Interacts With Educational Level}, number={2}, volume={29}, issn={0894-4393}, journal={Social Science Computer Review}, pages={221--231}, author={Funke, Frederik and Reips, Ulf-Dietrich and Thomas, Randall K.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28667"> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-08-13T15:25:41Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</dc:contributor> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:creator>Funke, Frederik</dc:creator> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:creator>Thomas, Randall K.</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Thomas, Randall K.</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:creator>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Funke, Frederik</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:title>Sliders for the Smart : Type of Rating Scale on the Web Interacts With Educational Level</dcterms:title> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Social Science Computer Review ; 29 (2011). - S. 221-231</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-08-13T15:25:41Z</dc:date> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/28667"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Slider scales and radio buttons scales were experimentally compared in horizontal and vertical orientation. Slider scales lead to statistically significantly higher break-off rates (odds ratio = 6.9) and substantially higher response times. Problems with slider scales were especially prevalent in participants with less than average education, suggesting the slider scale format is more challenging in terms of previous knowledge needed or cognitive load. An alternative explanation, technology-dependent sampling (Buchanan & Reips, 2001), cannot fully account for the current results. The authors clearly advise against the use of Java-based slider scales and advocate low-tech solutions for the design of Web-based data collection. Orientation on screen had no observable effect on data quality or usability of rating scales. Implications of item format for Web-based surveys are discussed.</dcterms:abstract> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>