Frege and the German Background to Analytic Philosophy

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2013
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
BEANEY, Michael, ed.. The Oxford handbook of the history of analytic philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 280-297. ISBN 978-0-19-923884-2. Available under: doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238842.013.0009
Zusammenfassung

Accounts of analytic philosophy often give the impression that it arose in opposition to continental philosophy. This may be true of British philosophers such as Russell, Moore, and Ryle. But it is certainly not true of Frege, as this chapter seeks to show through detailed textual analysis. Although Frege makes little explicit reference to other authors in his writings, many parallels can be found in the work of those in the continental tradition—for example, in Herbart’s conception of number statements and his concept of existence and in Trendelenburg’s philosophy of language. In particular, Frege’s anti-psychologistic epistemology, with its strict distinction between the validity (Geltung) and genesis (Genese) of knowledge, is in substantial agreement with positions that had been anticipated by Herbart and developed, especially, in the value-theoretic tradition of neo-Kantianism (Windelband, Rickert, and Bauch) that goes back to Lotze. This agreement reaches into his logic, where Frege was even influenced by earlier psychologistic logicians such as Sigwart. In particular, Frege’s theory of judgement, with its emphasis on judgement as an act, proves to be a systematic transformation of views propounded in the post-Kantian debates about the forms of judgement in the nineteenth century.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690GABRIEL, Gottfried, 2013. Frege and the German Background to Analytic Philosophy. In: BEANEY, Michael, ed.. The Oxford handbook of the history of analytic philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 280-297. ISBN 978-0-19-923884-2. Available under: doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238842.013.0009
BibTex
@incollection{Gabriel2013Frege-56810,
  year={2013},
  doi={10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238842.013.0009},
  title={Frege and the German Background to Analytic Philosophy},
  isbn={978-0-19-923884-2},
  publisher={Oxford University Press},
  address={Oxford},
  booktitle={The Oxford handbook of the history of analytic philosophy},
  pages={280--297},
  editor={Beaney, Michael},
  author={Gabriel, Gottfried}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/56810">
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-03-09T13:31:40Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:title>Frege and the German Background to Analytic Philosophy</dcterms:title>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-03-09T13:31:40Z</dc:date>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Gabriel, Gottfried</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/56810"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Gabriel, Gottfried</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Accounts of analytic philosophy often give the impression that it arose in opposition to continental philosophy. This may be true of British philosophers such as Russell, Moore, and Ryle. But it is certainly not true of Frege, as this chapter seeks to show through detailed textual analysis. Although Frege makes little explicit reference to other authors in his writings, many parallels can be found in the work of those in the continental tradition—for example, in Herbart’s conception of number statements and his concept of existence and in Trendelenburg’s philosophy of language. In particular, Frege’s anti-psychologistic epistemology, with its strict distinction between the validity (Geltung) and genesis (Genese) of knowledge, is in substantial agreement with positions that had been anticipated by Herbart and developed, especially, in the value-theoretic tradition of neo-Kantianism (Windelband, Rickert, and Bauch) that goes back to Lotze. This agreement reaches into his logic, where Frege was even influenced by earlier psychologistic logicians such as Sigwart. In particular, Frege’s theory of judgement, with its emphasis on judgement as an act, proves to be a systematic transformation of views propounded in the post-Kantian debates about the forms of judgement in the nineteenth century.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen