Publikation: Is (Un)Countabilism Restrictive?
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2025
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Forcing: Conceptual Change in the Foundations of Mathematics
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Journal of Philosophical Logic. Springer. 2025, 54, S. 1061-1077. ISSN 0022-3611. eISSN 1573-0433. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1007/s10992-025-09812-8
Zusammenfassung
Let’s suppose you think that there are no uncountable sets. Have you adopted a restrictive position? It is certainly tempting to say yes—you’ve prohibited the existence of certain kinds of large set. This paper argues that this intuition can be challenged. Instead, I argue that a formal notion of restrictiveness suggests that it is restrictive to hold that there are uncountable sets.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
BARTON, Neil, 2025. Is (Un)Countabilism Restrictive?. In: Journal of Philosophical Logic. Springer. 2025, 54, S. 1061-1077. ISSN 0022-3611. eISSN 1573-0433. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1007/s10992-025-09812-8BibTex
@article{Barton2025UnCou-75966,
title={Is (Un)Countabilism Restrictive?},
year={2025},
doi={10.1007/s10992-025-09812-8},
volume={54},
issn={0022-3611},
journal={Journal of Philosophical Logic},
pages={1061--1077},
author={Barton, Neil}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/75966">
<dcterms:title>Is (Un)Countabilism Restrictive?</dcterms:title>
<dc:creator>Barton, Neil</dc:creator>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2026-01-28T13:12:44Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:abstract>Let’s suppose you think that there are no uncountable sets. Have you adopted a restrictive position? It is certainly tempting to say yes—you’ve prohibited the existence of certain kinds of large set. This paper argues that this intuition can be challenged. Instead, I argue that a formal notion of restrictiveness suggests that it is restrictive to hold that there are uncountable sets.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:issued>2025</dcterms:issued>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2026-01-28T13:12:44Z</dc:date>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/75966"/>
<dc:contributor>Barton, Neil</dc:contributor>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Ja
