Intrasexual competition and contrast effects on men's self-ratings of attractiveness and social ascendancy : Status, physical fitness or looks?

Wade, T. Joel; McCrea, Sean M.

Intrasexual competition and contrast effects on men's self-ratings of attractiveness and social ascendancy : Status, physical fitness or looks?

Dateien

wademccrea.pdfGröße: 12.63 MBDownloads: 488

Datum

1999

Autor:innen

Wade, T. Joel

McCrea, Sean M.

URI (zitierfähiger Link)

http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-76306

Link zur Lizenz

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Psychologie

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Psychology, evolution & gender. 1999, 1, pp. 229-243

Zusammenfassung

In order to determine which of the three male perception foci, status, physical dominance, or looks, lead to contrast effects on men's self-rated physical and sexual attractiveness, and social ascendancy men were exposed to a high or low status and physically fit or unfit man (Experiment 1) or (0 3 physically fit or unfit and attractive or unattractive man (Experiment 2). Since men can effectively derogate the physical dominance of 3 male competitor but cannot effectively derogate the attractiveness of a male competitor higher self-ratings of social ascendancy were hypothesized for exposure to a fit man and lower ratings of attractiveness were hypothesized for exposure to an attractive man. The results were consistent with the hypotheses. Contrast effects are a function of exposure to the physically dominant and physically attractive in accordance with evolutionary biological explanations of male intrasexual competition.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

intersexual competition, contrast effects, attractiveness, social ascendancy, male self-perception, evolutionary theory

Zitieren

ISO 690

WADE, T. Joel, Sean M. MCCREA, 1999. Intrasexual competition and contrast effects on men's self-ratings of attractiveness and social ascendancy : Status, physical fitness or looks?. In: Psychology, evolution & gender. 1999, 1, pp. 229-243

BibTex

@article{Wade1999Intra-10287,
  year={1999},
  title={Intrasexual competition and contrast effects on men's self-ratings of attractiveness and social ascendancy : Status, physical fitness or looks?},
  volume={1},
  journal={Psychology, evolution & gender},
  pages={229--243},
  author={Wade, T. Joel and McCrea, Sean M.}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/10287">
    <dcterms:title>Intrasexual competition and contrast effects on men's self-ratings of attractiveness and social ascendancy : Status, physical fitness or looks?</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>McCrea, Sean M.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10287/1/wademccrea.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:creator>Wade, T. Joel</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:15:45Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Psychology, evolution &amp; gender 1 (1999), pp. 229-243</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>1999</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:15:45Z</dcterms:available>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/10287"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10287/1/wademccrea.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Wade, T. Joel</dc:contributor>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>McCrea, Sean M.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In order to determine which of the three male perception foci, status, physical dominance, or looks, lead to contrast effects on men's self-rated physical and sexual attractiveness, and social ascendancy men were exposed to a high or low status and physically fit or unfit man (Experiment 1) or (0 3 physically fit or unfit and attractive or unattractive man (Experiment 2). Since men can effectively derogate the physical dominance of 3 male competitor but cannot effectively derogate the attractiveness of a male competitor higher self-ratings of social ascendancy were hypothesized for exposure to a fit man and lower ratings of attractiveness were hypothesized for exposure to an attractive man. The results were consistent with the hypotheses. Contrast effects are a function of exposure to the physically dominant and physically attractive in accordance with evolutionary biological explanations of male intrasexual competition.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Nein