Breaking habits with implementation intentions : A test of underlying processes
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Implementation intentions specifying the replacement of a habitual response with an alternative response in a critical situation can overrule habits. In three experiments the cognitive effects of such counterhabitual implementation intentions were investigated. Results showed that implementation intentions eliminated the cognitive advantage of the habitual means in the “horse race” with the alternative response. That is, in the control condition, the habitual means was more accessible than the alternative means on encountering the critical situation, but this was no longer the case when implementation intentions were formulated. However, the cognitive advantage of the habitual means was not immediately replaced by an automatic activation of the alternative means. This suggests that formulating counterhabitual implementation intentions increases individuals’ flexibility to choose which behavior to perform in the critical situation but that actual behavior will depart from their habits only to the extent that individuals have strong alternative goal intentions.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
ADRIAANSE, Marieke A., Peter M. GOLLWITZER, Denise De RIDDER, John B. F. DE WIT, Floor M. KROESE, 2011. Breaking habits with implementation intentions : A test of underlying processes. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2011, 37(4), pp. 502-513. ISSN 0146-1672. eISSN 1552-7433. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0146167211399102BibTex
@article{Adriaanse2011-04Break-17011, year={2011}, doi={10.1177/0146167211399102}, title={Breaking habits with implementation intentions : A test of underlying processes}, number={4}, volume={37}, issn={0146-1672}, journal={Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin}, pages={502--513}, author={Adriaanse, Marieke A. and Gollwitzer, Peter M. and Ridder, Denise De and de Wit, John B. F. and Kroese, Floor M.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/17011"> <dcterms:issued>2011-04</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Ridder, Denise De</dc:contributor> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-04-30T22:25:06Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Kroese, Floor M.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin ; 37 (2011), 4. - S. 502-513</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:contributor>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>de Wit, John B. F.</dc:creator> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-01-10T07:56:11Z</dc:date> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Kroese, Floor M.</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Implementation intentions specifying the replacement of a habitual response with an alternative response in a critical situation can overrule habits. In three experiments the cognitive effects of such counterhabitual implementation intentions were investigated. Results showed that implementation intentions eliminated the cognitive advantage of the habitual means in the “horse race” with the alternative response. That is, in the control condition, the habitual means was more accessible than the alternative means on encountering the critical situation, but this was no longer the case when implementation intentions were formulated. However, the cognitive advantage of the habitual means was not immediately replaced by an automatic activation of the alternative means. This suggests that formulating counterhabitual implementation intentions increases individuals’ flexibility to choose which behavior to perform in the critical situation but that actual behavior will depart from their habits only to the extent that individuals have strong alternative goal intentions.</dcterms:abstract> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/17011/1/gollwitzeretal.pdf"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/17011"/> <dc:contributor>de Wit, John B. F.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>Breaking habits with implementation intentions : A test of underlying processes</dcterms:title> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/17011/1/gollwitzeretal.pdf"/> <dc:creator>Ridder, Denise De</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Adriaanse, Marieke A.</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Adriaanse, Marieke A.</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>