German collective actions : is litigation funding in a dead end?

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2022
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
KRAMER, Xandra, ed., Jos HOEVENAARS, ed., Betül KAS, ed., Erlis THEMELI, ed.. Frontiers in Civil Justice : Privatisation, Monetisation and Digitisation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022, pp. 259-275. ISBN 9781802203813. Available under: doi: 10.4337/9781802203820.00021
Zusammenfassung

Funding of mass litigation encounters severe problems in the German legal system. Traditionally, lawyers must not enter into contingency fee arrangements or provide litigation funding. Third party funding (TPF) is also of minor importance as case law prohibits consumer associations from using TPF. A growing number of debt collecting companies is operating on the market today. They offer enforcement of damages claims based on assignments and in exchange for a considerable success fee. The German Legal Services Act which restricts legal services provided by non-lawyers has turned out to be a real obstacle for this business model due to very strict interpretations by German courts. In 2021, the German legislature proposed a reform in order to allow contingency fees for lawyers in some cases and to provide a level playing field for professional debt collecting companies and lawyers.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
340 Recht
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Datensätze
Zitieren
ISO 690STADLER, Astrid, 2022. German collective actions : is litigation funding in a dead end?. In: KRAMER, Xandra, ed., Jos HOEVENAARS, ed., Betül KAS, ed., Erlis THEMELI, ed.. Frontiers in Civil Justice : Privatisation, Monetisation and Digitisation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022, pp. 259-275. ISBN 9781802203813. Available under: doi: 10.4337/9781802203820.00021
BibTex
@incollection{Stadler2022-08-18Germa-67513,
  year={2022},
  doi={10.4337/9781802203820.00021},
  title={German collective actions : is litigation funding in a dead end?},
  isbn={9781802203813},
  publisher={Edward Elgar Publishing},
  address={Cheltenham, UK},
  booktitle={Frontiers in Civil Justice : Privatisation, Monetisation and Digitisation},
  pages={259--275},
  editor={Kramer, Xandra and Hoevenaars, Jos and Kas, Betül and Themeli, Erlis},
  author={Stadler, Astrid}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/67513">
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-08-07T13:18:22Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Stadler, Astrid</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract>Funding of mass litigation encounters severe problems in the German legal system. Traditionally, lawyers must not enter into contingency fee arrangements or provide litigation funding. Third party funding (TPF) is also of minor importance as case law prohibits consumer associations from using TPF. A growing number of debt collecting companies is operating on the market today. They offer enforcement of damages claims based on assignments and in exchange for a considerable success fee. The German Legal Services Act which restricts legal services provided by non-lawyers has turned out to be a real obstacle for this business model due to very strict interpretations by German courts. In 2021, the German legislature proposed a reform in order to allow contingency fees for lawyers in some cases and to provide a level playing field for professional debt collecting companies and lawyers.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <dcterms:title>German collective actions : is litigation funding in a dead end?</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-08-07T13:18:22Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Stadler, Astrid</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/67513"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2022-08-18</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen